f**k some of you guys are small minded.....
Will they take a hit? 'Course not.
Will they notice that 900+ rounds of baby killing bullets are gone out of stock without record of them being sold? Yup.
Will they overreact to the above? Probably.
Will they consider it too large of a liability to continue to stock ammo as it is just "dissapearing"? Also likely.
Give yer heads a shake...stealing is stealing regardless of who it is from, Trying to justify it is just you trying to feel better about being a punk.
As if stealing isn't stupid enough, stealing ammo is likely to cause the store to stop selling it, thereby screwing over ALL gun owners in the area.....and thats not only morally repugnant, it's f**king stupid.
WTF is this world coming to.....men used to have honour, nows punks come in and brag about how they screwed a local retailer for multiple bricks of ammo....AND they get cheered on by other members!
Sad. Just friggin sad.....
Uhh.. As a CT employee... Not likely.
It's treated as stock that comes in via purolator, kept under lock and key, and is sold only to authorized individuals and nothing more.
The UPC code on the outside of a case of thunderbolt .22s is the exact same as the ones on the small boxes on the inside. So, 500 rounds will scan the exact same as 50. Sometimes 10 boxes will get entered into the system as 1, because whoever scans them into stock won't realize that there's ten boxes inside the big one. (Which also has all the logos on it. Happens especially when pallet loads of ammunition come in before hunting season) As well, if somebody (Mind you, somebody not too familiar with the .22 ammo) were to set the shelf up for those without realizing they have to come out of the box, you'd be paying 3 bucks a brick. Chances are it'll get fixed soon enough.
And I don't think it's stealing when the customer brings the item (Or has the item carried, as anything that's locked up is, to prevent shoplifting) up to the cash, the cashier scans the UPC that's on the box (And the customer has not tampered with whatsoever) and the customer then pays the price the item scans for.
Morally wrong if the customer is aware of this error, no doubt, but not flat out theft either.