awesome writeup sjemac!
as for lethality, checking for pattern i found the lead shot will penetrate the rubber banding used for holding targets, while the steel will only go halfway in
althou ive never shot a duck with lead, i can remember going hunting with a buddies dad when i was young and he could shoot birds at a longer distance (tighter choke) and they would fall to the ground when hit
my hunting experience this year is not so great for shooting birds out of the air, yesterday i shot two birds with dead hits that would have turned a clay to dust and one nearly hit the ground before regaining flight while the other dropped about 10' and kept flying with the flock, amazing how many piles of feathers ive seen around too which i can only assume have kept mangy coyote populations well fed, out of the air 3/5 dropped and ended up in my belly
imho steel shot is inhumanebut apparently it keeps the waterfowl from "eating the lead shot" :S
You also have to be careful not to shoot high # steel through a full choked barrel.
There is a whole generation of new waterfowl hunters that have likely never fired a lead shotshell at ducks and geese. Nothing dropped greenheads like 1 1/4 ounce of chilled 5's![]()
Agreed. If you want the old lead experience use bismuth. Very close to lead in terms of density and fomability. One issue with bismuth is that it is expensive.
Yup, bought a box (10) #4 - 1 3/8 oz. Bismuth few years ago. Might as well have left my first born there for the price of them. Hanging on to those puppy's for a late season mallard shoot some day.
That is an old myth that came around when everything went non-toxic shot for waterfoul. I wish this myth would just go away and die. There is absolutley nothing wrong with shooting steel waterfoul loads thru a full choke. I have been shooting 3.5" #2 goose loads thru a full choke with my 870 for the past 11 years with no issues.
I dunno everybody else says you'll bulge the barrel. Local gunshop has a bunch of bulged, cracked and/or exploded barrels from steel shot. I've been ok shooting 2s through a full and BBs but I wouldn't risk it.
Steel bruises the meat really bad and it drags the feathers through. I don't like steel, but I'm not an avid waterfowler.
I started on lead at 12 and by 16 I was taking my legal limit of 6 ducks on PEI with less than a box of shells. In 1992 I believe, our specific marsh (heavily hunted) was one of the first to go steel. Wow. The steel shot of the day was attrocious. Opening day sounded like a battle with the Taliban. It took me nearly 4 boxes to kill 6 ducks. I practiced and practiced and the results weren't much better. As the years went on I nearly quit altogether. Then Bismuth appeared and I bought some. Killed ducks like crazy.
Went strictly Bismuth for a few years until I moved to AB and my 60 ducks per year went to about 260. Can't afford $3.00 a shell at that rate.
Went back to steel and was pleased to see that it improved immensely. I eventually stumbled across my black magic combo of #6 steel and an Xtra Full extended choke tube along with leads that put the pellets on the head. #4 as the season gets older and #2 for geese. My goal now is to get a CNS hit and the head is my target. Small steel at closer ranges actually does a better job of breaking bones than the larger stuff. Think jabbing a pool cue tip at a piece of plywood versus a baseball bat.
Hevishot is far and away better than lead though. I keep a pocket of 3 inch 6's and 4's for killing crips out past 60 yards. It sounds like an axe biting into wood when you crack an injured bird with it. But at 3-4 bucks a shot I won't be shooting many limits with it. I keep it for backup in case a rookie I hunt with wingtips something and it keeps going. If I could afford it, Hevishot and the other Tungsten based shells would be the only thing I'd shoot -- even over lead.



























