kingair
Regular
LOL! No congo because they aren't as 'easy' to fight middle estern insurgents, and because there is no benefit to us being there! We don't help the needy, we help the needy that have assets we are interested in! Plus, I wouldn't mind goin up against tanks, make use of our tanks AT weapons and new aircraft! Canada is like an MMA fighter with 20 wins no loses. Cept all his fights are against dudes with one arm or blind. What ever happend to a good hardy battle?!?! Well I guess ww2 killed that.
Don't be fooled thinking that fight insurgents in mud huts are easy. The biggest mistake in combat is underestimating your enemy. Look a the history in Afghanistan, there has been a clear winner in years. The taliban are more organized than you think. They employ ECM on our troops, they are and have mounted organized attacks, company size attacks.
There are several problems with the Congo. One is how many troops can we field in the Congo.
They have a military of 130,000. We will be fighting in their land. Logistically we can support 5000. Who else will be in the fight with us? Unless we're declaring war with the Congo, why go?
Waste of our troops and money to help those that don't want our help.
Our current roto schedule is 1 Regiment is deployed, 1 in work up and the last in training. Again why waste our resources, what happens when we need it for ourselves?