Why is the Sako A7 not popular?

A thousand will probably get you a stainless A7 as well, and maybe even with a Burris scope on it. I don't know why you'd buy a walnut stocked Model 700 just so you can buy an aftermarket stock for it.

I came to a conclusion with my Tikka as well, that freedom from aftermarket parts meant I could for once, just leave that adequate gun alone and use it as it came from the factory.

Does you remington get tested at the factory for 5 shots into 1 inch at 100 yards?

Not sure what you mean about bulky integral scope bases. The bases that come with the gun are weaver style and attach with screws like any other base. You are free to discard them if you don't like them, but I'm using them and see no problem.
 
Grizzlypeg said:
I don't know why you'd buy a walnut stocked Model 700 just so you can buy an aftermarket stock for it.

Does you remington get tested at the factory for 5 shots into 1 inch at 100 yards?
Click to expand...

IMHO the stock and it's fitment or "feel" is paramount to the overall performance of a rifle in my hands. Myself and many others prefer the mcmillan offerings.
The only factory stock that comes close for me is the Kimber Montana.

The MOA guarantee is decent for sure, but I think with most late model mid-tier factory bolt actions easily able to achieve MOA with handloads it's not that big of a deal.

I'll be sure and bump this thread if the A-7 goes the way of the Dodo bird as I suspect it will.
 
I'll add specifically why I purchased this rifle:

1)Like the trigger and bolt on my Tikka and figured this would be the same;
2) I like the accuracy of my Tikka and figured this would be the same;
3) Reasonably light.

Just a good practical gun in stainless. The stock could be nicer, but you don't find molded plastic stocks much better, nor do you find composite fiberglass stocks at cheap prices. So its basically a compromise like most manufacturor's synthetic stock offerings.
 
Grizzlypeg said:
I'll add specifically why I purchased this rifle:

1)Like the trigger and bolt on my Tikka and figured this would be the same;
2) I like the accuracy of my Tikka and figured this would be the same;
3) Reasonably light.

Just a good practical gun in stainless. The stock could be nicer, but you don't find molded plastic stocks much better, nor do you find composite fiberglass stocks at cheap prices. So its basically a compromise like most manufacturor's synthetic stock offerings.
Click to expand...

I apologize, I thought the weaver bases on the A7 were milled into the receiver. It also shows that Tally has the one piece lightweights for the A7. +1 for the A7 :)

As for cheap, GOOD fiberglass stocks....

Bell and Carlson Alaskan Ti ultralight stock. 207$, they don't seem to show one for the A7 though :p
 
Grizzlypeg said:
You are right, there may not be a sustainable market for this rifle, but I still think its worth the $800 I paid for one.
Click to expand...

At the end of the day if you're happy with the rifle and it performs to your expectations for a fair price then it's all good.
Lord knows a field rifle that won't group or that doesn't leave the safe because you prefer to carry something else is wasted cash at any price point.
 
Sun_and_Steel_77 said:
At the end of the day if you're happy with the rifle and it performs to your expectations for a fair price then it's all good.
Lord knows a field rifle that won't group or that doesn't leave the safe because you prefer to carry something else is wasted cash at any price point.
Click to expand...

:cheers:

On that note I need a used T3 in .338 Federal to chop/cut :evil:
 
archie_james_c said:
I apologize, I thought the weaver bases on the A7 were milled into the receiver. It also shows that Tally has the one piece lightweights for the A7. +1 for the A7 :)

As for cheap, GOOD fiberglass stocks....

Bell and Carlson Alaskan Ti ultralight stock. 207$, they don't seem to show one for the A7 though :p
Click to expand...

Dont' forget the user adjustable trigger on A7/T3 (which is fantastic as Im sure you noticed on your Sako) unlike the 700 trigger is not supposed to be adjusted by anyone but a Remington Approved Smith unless you want your Warranty voided.

Walker Death Trigger !!! :p;):D
 
Pathfinder said:
Dont' forget the user adjustable trigger on A7/T3 (which is fantastic as Im sure you noticed on your Sako) unlike the 700 trigger is not supposed to be adjusted by anyone but a Remington Approved Smith unless you want your Warranty voided.

Walker Death Trigger !!! :p;):D
Click to expand...

Remington's newer trigger is user adjustable. I'll let you know how it works when I get my Alaskan Titanium next week.:)
 
you guys bicker back and forth like a bunch of old women!
i have a a7 in 300wsm and it is an amazing rifle. i picked it up at a great price as a kit with scope/rings
mine will shoot better then i can
it will shoot 1/2 inch groops at 300 yards no problem...with factory shells
i am very impressed with how it performs and wouldnt trade it for anything.

every one likes different things in a gun so there is no right or wrong
its no different then trucks...we all know what we like and we'll stand behind it
 
Pathfinder said:
Dont' forget the user adjustable trigger on A7/T3 (which is fantastic as Im sure you noticed on your Sako) unlike the 700 trigger is not supposed to be adjusted by anyone but a Remington Approved Smith unless you want your Warranty voided.

Walker Death Trigger !!! :p;):D
Click to expand...

Fear the WALKER DEATH TRIGGER!!!:D
 
I say its not that popular because a rifle this accurate is humbling. Any time you miss anything at any distance, you know its your fault. Most shooters just can't handle that awesomeness and prefer to buy something lesser, like a Reminton 700 so that they have excuses.
 
I guess i will have to get on thiss and defend the A7, I own a
ss one in 7mm RM, I will have to agree that the recoil pad is a joke,
but did add a Limbsaver on it and its now a charm, will shoot the cheap federal blue box under an inch without a problem, the trigger is amazing and the bolt is on
ball bearings, the stock is just a piece off plastic, yes but for a rifle that will see a lot off use in #### weather and be on my shoulder walking a lot I will take it over a piece off walnut any day. plus I wont be worried about damaging the thing or scratching the pretty premium walnut. People ##### about the plastic trigger guards, mags and stuff but then turn around and drool over the newest black rifle which are all made out off plastic. you should see the the brits service rifle... I got to handle one the other day, talk about a plastic gun.... anyway, cant be that bad if it gets trusted on the two way ranges off afghanistan! I also own a Rem 700, love the thing but the action, trigger and such are far from the Sako niceness.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom