WWIII,
Some very good points. I love my R33 bolt release. It is well sized and the upper and lower raised ridge bars provide excellent tactile cues for your fingers.
NEA, is the production version going to be parkerized to match the rifle? Will you be releasing a parkerized flat top receiver?
nothing is stopping NEA in future from making two versions of this product - one with a wide tab and one with a narrow tab.
You mean apart from copyright law and the resultant lawsuit that would come from SEI?
FWIW, the R33 models are no longer available due, as I recall, to legal issues with SEI.
You mean apart from copyright law and the resultant lawsuit that would come from SEI?
I heard through the rumour mill it was over copyright problems with the bolt release and his near exact copy of a SEI flash hider. I stand to be corrected though.
Rummers bloomers - that was the cheek rests and between DWP and Rooster. Rooster is still a member here why don’t you ask him instead of spreading more rummers.
Rummers bloomers - that was the cheek rests and between DWP and Rooster. Rooster is still a member here why don’t you ask him instead of spreading more rummers.
I'm afraid you are very wrong. It depends entirely on how the patent was filed. If SEI submitted it as a GI holdopen with a top protrusion to make closure easier or similar wording it is still a violation.
Cosmetic differences do NOT get you around patent law. Lots of case law supports this.
Canada is a small market for SEI, but if someone marketed the R-33 holdopen in the USA, SEI would definitely file a suit.
I'm afraid you are very wrong. It depends entirely on how the patent was filed. If SEI submitted it as a GI holdopen with a top protrusion to make closure easier or similar wording it is still a violation.
Cosmetic differences do NOT get you around patent law. Lots of case law supports this.
Canada is a small market for SEI, but if someone marketed the R-33 holdopen in the USA, SEI would definitely file a suit.
So... because you saw some rummers on the CGN forum it must be true?
1. SEI did not invent the M14 bolt release therefore they do not enjoy protection under patent law as a “new invention“ - meaning anyone can manufacture one.
2. The SEI bolt release design does what the “original M14 design” does - the end result is the same - it holds the bolt open and releases it by pushing on a tab. The difference being the unique geometry of the SEI bolt release - nothing more. This means they enjoy protection for their unique geometry and only if the patent is approved. Just because it may be easier to hold open or close the bolt with the SEI bolt release does not stop other designs from doing the same.
3. The two other designs, NEA and R33 have different “visually distinguishable geometry“ and thus are readily “distinguishable“ from the SEI design. They are not duplicates thus not infringing on SEI’s pending M14 bolt release patent.
Can you understand this or is it too simple for you?