According to the link below, the VX-3 is the higher quality scope, and about equal to the Bushnell Elite 4200.
And the VX3 is higher priced than any other scope listed as being of the same quality.In fact,it is higher priced than some scopes that were rated higher.
All which should theoretically give a brighter, crisper image, though I honestly can't tell much difference optically between a VX-III and VX3.
B/c there is none exept the "new and improoved" VX-3 is double the money of VX-III.
Please do tell us about the Zeiss Conquest yet again.......
The Bushnell Elite 4200,and the NIkon Monarch are both rated equal to the vx3,and both of them are also considerably lower priced than the VX3.
I don't know if SWFA rates the 4200 well based on the optics or based on the features...
51% Optical Quality - How bright and clear the scope is.
15% Specifications - Field of view, eye relief, weight, adjustment travel, etc.
15% Durability - How do they with stand the test of time.
12% Special Features & Options - Proprietary items (reticles, design, turrets), Zoom ratio.
7% Warranty & Customer Service - How good are they.
Everyone's entitled to their opinion, including the folks on opticstalk who did the ratings.
All which should theoretically give a brighter, crisper image, though I honestly can't tell much difference optically between a VX-III and VX3.




























