SHOT SHOW 2011 - Mare's leg rifles by Puma

John Y Cannuck

RichPoorMan<br>Super Moderator
Moderating Team
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
5373580313_acc58eec54.jpg


Puma

5373580283_6bf67374fc.jpg
 
Last edited:
I've been looking online a bit lately, and can someone PLEASE explain the 1550 dollar cost of guns like this??? I love them, I need one, but can one not be made cheaper???
Levers don't need to be flared. Just barrel chopped, and stock shortened. I guess I keep wanting to see a basic , functional "mare's leg", that costs roughly the same as a regular lever gun.
 
I've been looking online a bit lately, and can someone PLEASE explain the 1550 dollar cost of guns like this??? I love them, I need one, but can one not be made cheaper???
Levers don't need to be flared. Just barrel chopped, and stock shortened. I guess I keep wanting to see a basic , functional "mare's leg", that costs roughly the same as a regular lever gun.

Buy a lever gun, pay a gunsmith to chop it.
 
Buy a lever gun, pay a gunsmith to chop it.

As soon as it goes less than 18 1/2 it becomes restricted!

The best way to have something like this in a non restricted form for a cheap price, would be to have a 16 inch win model 94 and chop the stock, while keeping the overall length over 26 inches.

Would be 4 inches longer than the ranch hand but might be the best way.
 
That lever is ridiculously large!
All Legacy and Rossi needs to do is ship mare's legs with full stocks to Canada and let us trim them ourselves..... and put a better lever on there!
replica-weapons-22-1095.jpg
 
That lever is ridiculously large!
All Legacy and Rossi needs to do is ship mare's legs with full stocks to Canada and let us trim them ourselves..... and put a better lever on there!
replica-weapons-22-1095.jpg
Lever type/size is a personal thing. Some folks like one type,some the other, just as with the standard length rifle.

I was told at the booth, that they thought this rifle would be considered a handgun here.
That said, to say that the Americans have a limited understanding of Canadian gun law is about as big an understatement as I could make.
That's based of the reactions I got to my explanations when shown (all kinds of) stuff we can't own, or can't use, or is restricted.
 
That lever is ridiculously large!
All Legacy and Rossi needs to do is ship mare's legs with full stocks to Canada and let us trim them ourselves..... and put a better lever on there!
replica-weapons-22-1095.jpg

I would rather have 4 extra inches of barrel than 4 extra inches of a useless stock that cant be shouldered anyways.

Next time I have access to a 16 inch carbine I am going to have to look into this.
 
I would rather have 4 extra inches of barrel than 4 extra inches of a useless stock that cant be shouldered anyways.

Next time I have access to a 16 inch carbine I am going to have to look into this.

I'd rather have a full stock that I can shoulder....sounds like you need a trapper!
 
Lever type/size is a personal thing. Some folks like one type,some the other, just as with the standard length rifle.

I was told at the booth, that they thought this rifle would be considered a handgun here.
That said, to say that the Americans have a limited understanding of Canadian gun law is about as big an understatement as I could make.
That's based of the reactions I got to my explanations when shown (all kinds of) stuff we can't own, or can't use, or is restricted.

It's all personal for sure... I just wonder who's hands are that big...:eek:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sounds like you need a trapper then! LOL

What difference is 4 inches of barrel gonna make if you want a full stock anyways?

I've got a trapper and I love the handling. A full stocked 12 incher would just be 4 inches shorter and lighter which would be even more back pack friendly then a trapper.
 
Nothing to do with hand size.
It's a John Wayne true grit image thing IMO. The more round lever affords the appearance of the ability to 'twirl' the rifle. As he did in the movies, and as chuck Connors also did in the old rifle man series.

I didn't ask, but I know the lever shape that was featured in Steve McQueen's movie that actually coined the term Mares leg, is already on the market by someone else. (Davidson's I think) Duplication of another design gets expensive, legally speaking.
 
the twirl factor is even more silly......the lawyers in the States will have fun when someone looses a toe twirling their mare's leg!
 
The Mare's Leg carbines are classified as Non-Restricted (that's right, NON-Restricted) firearms in Canada under the current FRT system. Look them up here:

https://secure.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/eCFISBWS/submitCmnRefIdSelection.do

(from the CFC's FRT tables)

Armi Sport Notes Serial Numbering: Numbered
Model: Winchester 1892 Mares Leg Notes Country: ITALY
Manufacturer: Chiappa Glossary Level: Manufacturer Specifications and Commercial Customization
Type: Rifle Legal Classification: Non-Restricted

1 45 COLT Keywords 6 305 Manufacturer Specifications and Commercial Customization Non-Restricted CC 2 "firearm" Glossary

We have the Chiappa MLs in .45 LC in stock.

I personally spoke with a representative from the CFO to confirm the status of these guns, despite the barrel being only 12 inches long, and the overall length of the gun being only 23 inches, well short of the 26-inch cut-off normally applicable to fit into this category. The response I received was this: "The Mare's Leg is fitted with a buttstock that can be fired from the shoulder, and is a modification of an existing model that has already been classified as a Non-Restricted firearm. There are no plans to review or alter the classification of this firearm at this time."
 
Back
Top Bottom