New czech rail system for cz858

I think the NEA set is a much more elegant solution and at even less than half the price. As a bonus NEA is Canadian and has proven to me to take care of their customers 100%.
 
murat said:
NeitArms, You don't have to copy it, just have alook at it and improve on it for exemple add to the design so it will not lose zero. Then we get even better Canadian Design
Click to expand...

We've played with a few designs... 2 of them are similar to this and both had the same flaws.. not repeatable (enough). A third is a great design, flawless, repeatable, but too expensive to produce. So it'll sit on the bench until things change or it changes. Right now we have too many projects ahead to bring these out right now.
 
Clobbersauras said:
Not acceptable in IMO. With a rifle that gives you maybe 3MOA on a good day that's a big shift. And you never know which way it's going to move. Just my opinion, others may vary.
Click to expand...

Well actually I would think about it this way...

I have an aimpoint compm4s with 2MOA dot. So, if my NEA mount shifts up to 1.0MOA that means it is most likely that it will only shift .5MOA to any point off center.

I have some up and down play that I still haven't cleared up even though NEA sent me some replacement parts to fix the issue, and I just tap my aimpoint down to seat fully if I think it's moved and it is dead on target again. At 100m I can hit every clay disc I throw up onto the berm.

I don't competition shoot and I'm less concerned with how dead of center my shot is, but that it is hitting within the area of my 2MOA dot. So far, whatever I put my dot on receives a solid strike.

I would classify my use as borderline abusive to the aimpoint and NEA mount and it is very reliable now that I got it sorted out.

Gunslinger said:
I think the NEA set is a much more elegant solution and at even less than half the price. As a bonus NEA is Canadian and has proven to me to take care of their customers 100%.
Click to expand...


Yeah NEA has top notch customer service, Charles seemed more than happy to help me sort out issues with a hand guard that I feel was misrepresented by the EE seller.
 
NeitArms, fair enough, I'm just paranoid about driling my CZ858. This is way I try to find solution that does not involve driling. You do have some good products
 
Gentlemen, if you do not mind, a few detailed pix...

IMG_4778.jpg


IMG_4779.jpg


IMG_4780.jpg
 
That answers one question, it is an official army design. My Czech is not that great but what I read at gunexpert website they are getting this mounts from the Czech goverment owned design factory that supplies Czech and Slovak armies. So it is propably quite good if it is army approved
 
They started selling them last week, the company is very good, shipping cheaper then anything from the US.
Only bad thing about the set is its price tag
 
I just read my old posts in this thread.

I since have bought an NEA upper hand-guard rail. While I hate having to remove my rail (and optic) every time I clean it, I have to admit that I am impressed by it's ability to return to zero.
 
Somehow i highly doubt they copied a newly-released rail system from a smaller canadian company over in the Czech republic on such short notice. Not to mention the two are completely different.

I still think NEA has the best top rail out there right now.
 
Satain said:
Pictures speak a million words and cosmeticaly it sort of look likes they copied B.C. Tactical's handguard set up or is it just me???
:confused:
Click to expand...

Well, I think it's you.

There's just so many ways you can make a quad rail handguard for a vz58...

And I doubt the Czech military would specifically copy the design of a small Canadian aftermarket parts maker. They have people for that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom