Mauser 96 in 9.3x57 - Decent Moose Gun?

You are talking about the 6.5X55..
The OP is asking about a 9.3X57 SPORTER on a 96 action..
Completely different deal..
PS I have both..

X2

Factory "sporter" 9.3x57 (or 9.3x62) hunting rifles are pretty darn light generally. The husqvarna ones in particular are great carrying rifles.

Also an interesting note - The load that made the 9.3x62 famous around a hundred years ago was a 286 gr bullet at 2300 fps. This is a bit slower than 9.3x62 loadings with the same bullet weight now (due to improvements in powder technology etc). Nowadays, the classic elephant and rhino killing recipe of 286's @ 2300 can regularly be duplicated by the handloader with the 9.3x57 (unless your rifle is cursed...).

So yes, great stuff for moose and other big Canadian game.
 
Heavy ?

If you are planning to be carrying the gun around in the bush all day, keep in mind that the sporterized swedes are very heavy

A sporterized Swedish Mauser is HEAVY? What did you handle, one with a metal stock?

If you buy a 9.3x57 Swedish Mauser, choose one that Trade-Ex advertises as a "Husqvarna Sporter" --- not "sporterized military rifle."

You will find that the Husqvarna Sporters, made specifically by Husqvarna as a sporting rifle, and not converted military rifles, are one of the nicest handling rifles that you could ask for if you want a hunting rifle.

Call Anthony on the toll free line, tell him the ones you are looking at, and he will send you pictures of them. I would suggest you get one with a "Very Good" or better barrel, with the rifle already drilled and tapped for a TOP MOUNTED scope (not a side mount), and a side mounted safety. Also, the bolt should have been modified for a scope if you intend to mount a scope on it.

When Trade-Ex states "very good" on the bore condition, you can bet that it will be a nice shiny bore. A rifle already drilled and tapped for top mounted scope (and many already have bases on them) will not cost you any money for a gunsmith to drill and tap it if you want to mount a scope, and a side mounted safety will be MUCH handier and convenient to use for hunting, and also allow the scope to be mounted lower.

The older Husqvarna models have a rounded pistol grip, and the later ones have a more squared off pistol grip. Either one is good, but I prefer the older "Classic" models. Mine was made in 1930, but sure does not look like it. Old world craftsmanship at a time when they took pride in producing a rifle, and spent time on getting it right.

Reloading is the way to go. The 9.3x57 Mauser cartridge is a bit slower, but it will dump anything you come up against in North America.

But HEAVY, the Husqvarna m96 factory sporter is not.
.
 
A sporterized Swedish Mauser is HEAVY? What did you handle, one with a metal stock?

If you buy a 9.3x57 Swedish Mauser, choose one that Trade-Ex advertises as a "Husqvarna Sporter" --- not "sporterized military rifle."

You will find that the Husqvarna Sporters, made specifically by Husqvarna as a sporting rifle, and not converted military rifles, are one of the nicest handling rifles that you could ask for if you want a hunting rifle.

Call Anthony on the toll free line, tell him the ones you are looking at, and he will send you pictures of them. I would suggest you get one with a "Very Good" or better barrel, with the rifle already drilled and tapped for a TOP MOUNTED scope (not a side mount), and a side mounted safety. Also, the bolt should have been modified for a scope if you intend to mount a scope on it.

When Trade-Ex states "very good" on the bore condition, you can bet that it will be a nice shiny bore. A rifle already drilled and tapped for top mounted scope (and many already have bases on them) will not cost you any money for a gunsmith to drill and tap it if you want to mount a scope, and a side mounted safety will be MUCH handier and convenient to use for hunting, and also allow the scope to be mounted lower.

The older Husqvarna models have a rounded pistol grip, and the later ones have a more squared off pistol grip. Either one is good, but I prefer the older "Classic" models. Mine was made in 1930, but sure does not look like it. Old world craftsmanship at a time when they took pride in producing a rifle, and spent time on getting it right.

Reloading is the way to go. The 9.3x57 Mauser cartridge is a bit slower, but it will dump anything you come up against in North America.

But HEAVY, the Husqvarna m96 factory sporter is not.
.

I've got my eye on a few of them, just waiting to hear back about the e-mail I sent them.

I'm actually thinking of going with a peep sight instead of a scope. I didn't think about the side mounted safety though...if I did get one with the "traditional" safety, how hard would it be to convert to a side safety? I see Bold offers a trigger for the 96 with a side safety.

Cory
 
Correct, the 9.3x62 was the "30-30" of African farmer fame.

Totally agree. And the 9.3X57 is thought to be the Swedish / Scandinavian version of the 9X57, crossed with the then well spreaded in that area .360 Nitro-Express (of British influence). The caliber was almost non-existent outside Scandinavia (and Finland to some extend).

The HVA 9.3X57 usually shoots better the 286 grainers in the 2100 / 2200 fps area. Many rifles won't spit the bullet much fastest, though, this seems to be due to barrel (over)size on some models.
The factory sights were regulated to 120 meters for a a M.V. of 630 m/s.
This means it will it the center of a 20 cm diameter target at 120 m when holding at 6 o'clock (or, if you better like, it will hit 4" higher than the point of aim @ 120 meters).
 
... - The load that made the 9.3x62 famous around a hundred years ago was a 286 gr bullet at 2300 fps....

Actually just a bit under 2100 fps. Hence being called "den gamle pĂĄtaten kaster" (I think that's the correct spelling) - the old potato-chucker. Cartridges of the World lists the Norma factory load as a 286 gr. SP @ 2065 fps. for about 2700 fpe.

:) Stuart
 
I'm actually thinking of going with a peep sight instead of a scope. I didn't think about the side mounted safety though...if I did get one with the "traditional" safety, how hard would it be to convert to a side safety? I see Bold offers a trigger for the 96 with a side safety.

Cory


I would stay with the regular safety if you go "Peep" Keep in on safe with the wing verticle, and you will never forget your safety is on, yet your rifle will always be at the ready with a swipe of your thumb
 
...The HVA 9.3X57 usually shoots better the 286 grainers in the 2100 / 2200 fps area....

Hmmm... that's about where I ended up the first time I took mine out to the range with some loads someone had recommended. Except that I didn't know his rifle was bult on the larger M98 action. I can't remember the exact velocity now but when I looked at the chronograph I thought, "That's a good bit higher than I expected!" No damage to gun or shooter but I figured I should back off a bit. I haven't shot it for quite a while now but I need to go back to the various threads here and on the Swedish Sporting Arms forum (where I know you are a regular) and look for safe loads around 2150 fps.

:) Stuart
 
I was thinking about getting one for the bush, But if you compare the 9.3x57 to a .303 Brit there's not much difference, at least you can get 303 ammo anywhere
 
Stuart,
Just be aware that some of the loads / velocities announced on the "other" forum are way out of space. To my point of view, there is no need to push the beast way beyond it's original loads. I have set my own loads for this caliber at about 2100 fps, wich is plenty enough.


If you reload, you can get a bit more energy (without considering the advantage of bullet diameter and weight) than the factory ammo and the .303 Brit.
8X57 brass is all around and is easy to reform.
If you don't reload, well, I totally agree with you.
 
Between Tradex's prices and their reputation, "what's not to like?". You will be a happy (and eventually well-fed) camper.

:) Stuart
 
Back
Top Bottom