Levers that shoot .357mag AND .38spl?

41 Colt

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
307   0   0
Location
BC
Marlin 1894 Cowboy & 1894C
Rossi/Puma M92 rifles

Any others? I had my heart set on one of the Winchesters but it seems they are .357 only.
 
You will sure have to explain to me, how could a Winchester lever shoot 357 mag, but not 38 Special!
 
Henry Big Boy

How are the Big Boy rifles? I had a Golden Boy .22 way back and had issues with the finish and they have a lot of plastic parts inside IIRC. I also am fond of the Winchester 1892/1894 design.

You will sure have to explain to me, how could a Winchester lever shoot 357 mag, but not 38 Special!

One I found on gunbroker said ".357 Magnum ONLY" on the barrel. Not sure if they are all like that.

Chiappa also appear to make separate .357 & .38 models in their 1892 designs.

I will be shooting mostly .38 but do not want to be limited to it and .357 is too pricey to shoot exclusively.
 
In my experience, a Browning 92 will only feed .357 length cartridges, while a Marlin .357 will feed both .38Sp and .357 length.
 
Marlin 1894 Cowboy & 1894C
Rossi/Puma M92 rifles

Any others? I had my heart set on one of the Winchesters but it seems they are .357 only.

Not sure what you mean, I have a Win 94 AE trapper SRC in .357 Mag. It cycles & shoots .38 Specials like nobody's business.

Unlike the Browning B-92 .357 Mag lever that I had that used to hang up on .38 Specials unless you made sure to give 'er a full stroke of the lever when cycling. Learned that the hard way during a cowboy action match, one time.... :(

2007-10-27_091302_1aCoffee.gif

NAA.
 
How are the Big Boy rifles? I had a Golden Boy .22 way back and had issues with the finish and they have a lot of plastic parts inside IIRC. I also am fond of the Winchester 1892/1894 design.

One I found on gunbroker said ".357 Magnum ONLY" on the barrel. Not sure if they are all like that.

Chiappa also appear to make separate .357 & .38 models in their 1892 designs.

I will be shooting mostly .38 but do not want to be limited to it and .357 is too pricey to shoot exclusively.

I don't have any first hand experience with the Henry myself. I was in the market for a lever .357 a couple of months ago and I picked up a Rossi 92 in 38/357.

- 20" Octagon barreled model weighs 2 pounds (6.5) less than the Henry (~8.5) with the same type and length of barrel.
- I didn't care for the tube loading of the Henry. It's fine for a .22 plinker but not something I'd want for hunting/cowboy action.
- The Henry cost $200 more.
- I opted for case hardening over flashy brass.

With Marlin as they are now, I couldn't buy one without handling it first. The Rossi has a big following and there are kits and resources available to slick these up and modify parts. That and I too am a fan of the 1892 design. :)
 
I have a B-92 that says ".357 Magnum" on the barrels and after trial and error that is all it gets fed. I also have a Puma with ".38 Spl/.357 Mag" that if I use .38 specials and rack the lever too quickly, the complete cartridge ejects from the rifle rather than chambering.
 
I have a B-92 that says ".357 Magnum" on the barrels and after trial and error that is all it gets fed. I also have a Puma with ".38 Spl/.357 Mag" that if I use .38 specials and rack the lever too quickly, the complete cartridge ejects from the rifle rather than chambering.

How long are the 38s you are using? Something like a 158gr LRN that's just over 1.5" OAL should cycle as good as a 357 cartridge.
 
I have a Chiappa 92. Haven't taken it to the range, so I can't give a report. I CAN tell you that the fit & finish are nicer than the Puma/Rossi and it doesn't have the bogus tang safety. I got the one with the 20" octagonal barrel.
Ch1892011.jpg

Ch1892009.jpg
[/IMG]
 
Back
Top Bottom