Throwing heavier lead in my Rossi Puma in .454 Casull

Northman999

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
225   0   0
Location
Southern Yukon
So, I purchased a Rossi Puma in .454 Casull late this winter, with the hopes of developing some heavy loads for it for use on Bison here in the Yukon.

There are some special regs for hunting Bison here; we need at least a 30 caliber bullet weighing at least 180 grains and developing at least 2800 ft/lbs of energy at the muzzle.

After spending a good amount of time scouring the internet, I found several instances of people posting loads that exceeded these requirements (energy levels being the only one that was any sort of a challenge). From what I found, people were getting peak energy levels with bullets in the 330 - 340 grain range, using hard cast lead.

I was not able to find any factory bullets heavier than 300 grains (Hornady XTP-Mag), nor any cast lead bullets anyone had in stock heavier than 300's as well. I picked up some of the 300 grain XTP-Mag's, and they shot well in my rifle, but I was not able to meet the performance levels that I had been reading about, and I fell short of my critical 2800 ft/lbs target.

In my search for heavier bullets I had communication with our own Ben Hunchak. He told me he would not mind casting me some heavier bullets for my rifle, and seemed to look forward to the idea of being able to get some heavier bullets out to other shooters who may want them as well. He pointed me in the direction of Accurate Molds in the U.S.A. Accurate had several molds that seemed pretty good, but none just right, so I contacted them and they allowed me to slightly customize one of their 340gr molds (basically just adding a gas check to it). Well, I ordered the mold and had it sent to Ben, who would cast me the mold's worth of bullets and then keep the mold so others could benefit from these bullets if they seemed useful. This seemed an outstanding idea to me, and I was pretty excited about the whole thing.

Well, a few weeks later, Ben got the mold, and within a couple of days he let me know the bullets were on their way. A few days later a seriously heavy parcel arrived in the mail with two boxes looking like this....

340grFPGC04jpg.jpg


Well, I was feeling like a fat kid at a sundae bar, and opened the packages to find the finest cast bullets I'd ever seen inside. Not dull grey and all dinged from shipping, these beauties, but shiny and smooth, with crisp lines and sharp edges. Right at that point it dawned on me that I was the only person in the world who had these bullets, and they were custom made for ME. Certainly never been there before.

I got them home and prepped some cases for loading. These bullets were much larger than the 300's I'd been loading before. Here are a few beside a prepped case.

340grFPGC02jpg.jpg


And one sitting just in the case mouth, right before seating.

340grFPGC01jpg.jpg


Well, I loaded up twenty something bullets over increasing charges of H110 (which research suggested was probably the best powder for heavy loads).

Here's how the first three turned out.

340grFPGC03jpg.jpg


After a few days of foul weather (heavy snow), the range dried up and I was able to get out and run my loads through my rifle and check for function, velocity and accuracy.

Unfortunately, no pics of any targets. But I do have some results.

Firstly I noticed that my rifle did not really like feeding these bullets, due to their wide, flat nose. I could feed 300gr Hornady XTP's, seated out farther, without issues, as they were more conical. The Rossi did feed the 340gr cast, but required a very firm hand. On my second trip to the range I loaded a handful of rounds into brass trimmed .012 shorter than normal "trim to length" for the .454 Casull, just to see if that worked, and they fed smooth as butter, so minor problem solved.

Accuracy was good with Ben's cast bullets, with three shot groups at 50 yards averaging right around an inch. I think they could have done better, but I do not like the semi-buckhorn sights on the Rossi at all, and I cannot do better than that with this type of sight. I've got an aperture sight setup in the works for this rifle.

I was not able to replicate the heavy loads I had found poking around the internet in terms of energy levels, unfortunately. I did not push my powder charges beyond those I found poking around, as I had read that straight wall pistol cartridges are particularly hard to judge pressure signs with, and I have only been reloading for the .454 for a couple of months. With a full load of H110, and some cream of wheat to add compression (both velocity and shot to shot consistency seemed to improve this way) my loads maxed out at 1775 fps. Without the cream of wheat filler, my rifle topped out at 1700 fps. Still deadly medicine, and I'm sure I'd be fine to drop anything on the continent with this load, except the beurocrats at Renewable Resources had to set the bar somewhere, and I've not been able to meet it (with any load in my rifle) for hunting Bison. There's plenty of other game to go around though!

I can't help but feel that numbers from a chrony and punching holes in paper are a poor indicators of what these bullets can do, and that only a very large moose or grizzly is going to be able to really show me what these bullets can do in real life.

In regards to the Rossi, I found it to be a good rifle overall, right out of the box. Better quality than the recent Marlins for sure, with a nice action and pretty good trigger. I did not like the semi-buckhorn sights, but they did seem a pretty good quality for what they were. The rifle shot one inch groups at 50 yards with more than one load I developed while farting around with it, so accuracy is perfectly fine for a close range rifle.

Hopefully this writeup will be of use to those of you who sent me PM's regarding the Rossi, or my experiences with Ben Hunchak's bullets so far.

EDIT - I inspected the bore of my rifle after two quick trips to the range to work on the load development I described, and the bore still looked like a mirror. No signs at all of any leading; approximately forty rounds down the pipe at that point.
 
Last edited:
Great post - the pics and description are very well done - thanks.

I haven't worked the 454 Casull, but have the 45 Colt. It's a smaller case and operates at quite a bit lower pressure, but I found that a few powders a bit slower than H110 performed very well with heavy bullets. Full cases of H4198 and WC-735 (or H322) over a magnum primer were accurate. In the 454, the MV will be lower (you already use a full case of faster H110), but pressure will be lower and accuracy might surprise you.
 
Thanks Andy, I may give your suggestions a try.

I don't just use full powered loads in this rifle, and one reason I bought it instead of a 45-70 was so I could shoot inexpensive and mild 45 colt cowboy loads in it.
 
Good read, thanks for the info. Ben is great to deal with, his work is top notch, prices are excellent and he is an encyclopedia of cast bullet knowledge and experience.


Mark
 
maybe try lilgun, see how it performs in a longer barrel. It has approximately the same burn rate as 110 but it burns a lot hotter (I hear it's a bit of a barrel burner), often throwing much greater velocities at lower pressures (depending on the cartridge).
 
The profile of this bullet point(meplat) is very similar to the LBT series of LFN and WFN noses, in the Marlins they tend to all feed quite well, with the exception of the .444 which requires a bullet with a much shorter nose. My .44s and .45/70s feed this type bullet very well and I'm wondering if the Rossi has shorter OAL requirements or if some smoothing should be done on the feed ramp, or some such.
 
The profile of this bullet point(meplat) is very similar to the LBT series of LFN and WFN noses, in the Marlins they tend to all feed quite well, with the exception of the .444 which requires a bullet with a much shorter nose. My .44s and .45/70s feed this type bullet very well and I'm wondering if the Rossi has shorter OAL requirements or if some smoothing should be done on the feed ramp, or some such.

Ben,

Here's what I know

With 300gr XTP-mag's, the rifle will feed -

COL 1.805" and a bullet nose length of .445" just fine (That's actually out farther than the crimp groove, but I experimented just to get maximum COL and maximum nose length for bullets for this rifle figured out.)

With the 340gr cast - the cartridges bind moderately at -

COL 1.765" and a nose length of .400"

With the 340gr cast - the cartridges feed fine at -

COL 1.750" and a nose length of .400"

What happens with the binding is the nose of the cartridge enters the chamber on an upward angle as it is being fed in, and "sticks" fairly fimly against the upper wall of the chamber. A good shove on the lever does feed it; or trimming the brass a bit shorter (for shorter COL) and the bullet clears the wall of the chamber completely.

I'm thinking the Rossi just doesn't like a WFN as much as more of a hollowpoint, but I may be wrong. You have much more experience with these sorts of things than I do. I think the angle that the cartridges are fed into the chamber on the model 92's is a steeper angle than the model 1895's, and that's why they seem to prefer a finer nose - a nose with a finer point would more easily navigate the steep feed angle than a flatter nose. I certainly don't see trimming my brass 0.010" - 0.012" as being any sort of problem. It's just good to know what this rifle likes and what it doesn't.

EDIT - I've also tried just plain seating the bullet deeper to 1.750" (regardless of where the crimp groove is) and crimping there. This seems to work fine and is the easiest way to do it. Also my brass lasts longer as it is not trimmed overly much. The bullets DO NOT get pushed back into the casing from recoil, as I pack any free space in my .454 cartridges with cream of wheat as I have found this gives me more velocity and much less shot-to-shot variation in velocity.
 
Last edited:
Hi Ben;
The best sights I've found for Rossi M92's are the Marble's Bullseye Ghost Ring sights.
They're super fast to center your eye on the target and have no sharp edges on them to hang up on lined gun bags or bushes. I've got these sights on both my Rossi .454 and Rossi .44 Mag and they make precise shooting easy.
I got these from Steve's Gunz as well as his ejector springs and stainless steel cartridge followers. The sights cost only $29.95 and are much better than the Skinner peep sights.
Steve's down in Texas, but he ships his stuff with USPS Express or Priority post so the cost is minimal compared to UPS(Rippoff!) or Fed Ex.

You'll want the sights with the 1 7/8" blade length for the M92 (Marbles #006950).
The rifle will shoot high if you stay with the stock front sight so a safe bet is to order a Marble's Contour front sight, P/N 105331. This sight has a 1/16" thick blade with a small brass bead and measures .531" high from the base of the dovetail.
I got the Marble's .570" front sight (P/N 105731) on both my Rossi's and filed them down to just the point where the bead is removed to leave a nice, thin blade. I prefer this type of sight for target and hunting. Rossi front sights are just too damn thick for me.
watermark.php

watermark.php


The front sights I mentioned aren't shown on Steve's Gunz website but email him to see if he can get them for you and bundle them with your order. I got mine from a gunsmith who just happened to have some around. Brownell's might help as well.
I haven't tried heavy cast loads out of my Rossi's yet but I'm going to order up some 300gr. hardcast .45's and .44's from The Bullet Barn and give them a try.
Enjoy your Rossi's, as they cant be beat for the money!
Cheers;
John
 
Last edited:
.454 Loads for Rossi

Your welcome.
I worked up a fun, accurate small/medium game load the other day that
is cheap to load and a gas to shoot.

Winchester cases and small rifle primers.
7.0 gr. Trail Boss powder.
Hornady .454" dia. round balls.

I seated the ball to just a hair past center into the cases and gave them a
hint of a crimp. At 25 yards I put 28 shots into a 3" X 4" group that blew out
half of the 2" bull in the target. There were a few fliers that opened the group to 8", but that's no worries though because all of these projectiles were pulled from a load I tried that sucked.

I'm confident that with fresh lead, this load will shoot "minute of squirrel" past 50yds. in my rifle. I've yet to chrony this load, but it should be in the 700-800fps. range.
When you 50 or more rounds a week it's nice to have accurate, affordable
loads that don't beat up the shooter and can put meat in the pot.
Give'em a try and get ready to giggle.
 
Your welcome.
I worked up a fun, accurate small/medium game load the other day that
is cheap to load and a gas to shoot.

Winchester cases and small rifle primers.
7.0 gr. Trail Boss powder.
Hornady .454" dia. round balls.

I seated the ball to just a hair past center into the cases and gave them a
hint of a crimp. At 25 yards I put 28 shots into a 3" X 4" group that blew out
half of the 2" bull in the target. There were a few fliers that opened the group to 8", but that's no worries though because all of these projectiles were pulled from a load I tried that sucked.

I'm confident that with fresh lead, this load will shoot "minute of squirrel" past 50yds. in my rifle. I've yet to chrony this load, but it should be in the 700-800fps. range.
When you 50 or more rounds a week it's nice to have accurate, affordable
loads that don't beat up the shooter and can put meat in the pot.
Give'em a try and get ready to giggle.

You'll get better accuracy if you use larger round balls, even 0.457" should improve things, but 0.460" would be better. At 0.454" in what is probably a 0.452" bore, the rifling is just "kissing" a thin ring of lead around the circumference of the ball - the ball might actually be "skidding" down the bore (have you recovered any to inspect them?). Using even a slightly larger ball greatly increases the ball-rifling contact area. The concern in using larger balls is that the larger ball will pinch the cartridge against the walls of the chamber, but if it drops or is easily pushed into a fired case, you'll be ok.
 
Great info on the loads! My Rossi shoots about 1.5 inch groups at 100 yards with Hornady XTP-mag factory loads, I have yet to replicate this with a homeload but I will in time. My rifle seems to like the 300-grain HP's.

As sights go, I removed the stock Rossi pieces if tin and installed a Marlin semi buckhorn rear sight, much easier on the eyes!
 
Have you tried randy garrett of garrett cartridges. He does loads for 44s and 45-70s. He's taken a lot of african game with his hotter heavy loads he may have something that can get the muzzle energy up
 
Back
Top Bottom