Rocket Surgery
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
I live in really rugged terrain on the west coast, and I always have a hard time deciding what to take for deer. Up until now, the only deer I shot were with Enfields and Mosins. I bought a Win94 recently but I also own an 858. I'm having a really hard time trying to find something Winchester has over the CZ. T
The 858 strong points:
* It's folding and smaller than the Win94
* It's semi auto
* Mag fed. If I see a deer while driving to my hunting area, I don't have to fiddle with a tube mag. The last deer I shot with my mosin I found loading off a stripper clip took too much time. Luckily it was a stupid deer and stood there looking at me.
* Pistol grip
* Synthetic furniture
* Ease of cleaning after getting soaked. I can get into the receiver of my 858 without tools, and there's no tube mag to clean. I don't have to protect the wood either. The gun is covered with paint, which is better than bluing in my opinion. This is an enormous factor on the west coast, where 80%+ of your hunting trips will get your gun wet. I don't have to apply oil to the barrel and tube mag either.
Win94 scores points on:
* Ammo availability
* Price
These guns score the same (in my opinion):
* Accuracy
* Reliability
* Weight and size
* Knock down power
Am I missing something here? I know that hunting ammo for the 7.62x39 hasn't made it to Wal-Mart or CT yet, but what does the Win94 have on the 858? They both really only have one bullet weight, 125g vs 170g. Both of which are more than capable on black bear or deer.
I find myself getting into this debate very often with my hunting friends, and about the only argument (which I think is wrong) that they make is that the 170g RN bullet punches through bush better.
I'm curious what people who own both, or have owned both, have to say on the topic.
The 858 strong points:
* It's folding and smaller than the Win94
* It's semi auto
* Mag fed. If I see a deer while driving to my hunting area, I don't have to fiddle with a tube mag. The last deer I shot with my mosin I found loading off a stripper clip took too much time. Luckily it was a stupid deer and stood there looking at me.
* Pistol grip
* Synthetic furniture
* Ease of cleaning after getting soaked. I can get into the receiver of my 858 without tools, and there's no tube mag to clean. I don't have to protect the wood either. The gun is covered with paint, which is better than bluing in my opinion. This is an enormous factor on the west coast, where 80%+ of your hunting trips will get your gun wet. I don't have to apply oil to the barrel and tube mag either.
Win94 scores points on:
* Ammo availability
* Price
These guns score the same (in my opinion):
* Accuracy
* Reliability
* Weight and size
* Knock down power
Am I missing something here? I know that hunting ammo for the 7.62x39 hasn't made it to Wal-Mart or CT yet, but what does the Win94 have on the 858? They both really only have one bullet weight, 125g vs 170g. Both of which are more than capable on black bear or deer.
I find myself getting into this debate very often with my hunting friends, and about the only argument (which I think is wrong) that they make is that the 170g RN bullet punches through bush better.
I'm curious what people who own both, or have owned both, have to say on the topic.





















































