Christensen Arms???

Remington country

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
Location
Fort Mcmurray
Hey Guys

I'm seriously thinking about purchasing a Christensen Arms Rifle has anyone on here ever Shot one or even Held one. They look amazing and from what i can see shoot just as good thanks guys :50cal:
 
If carbon wrapped barrels were really as good as people claim they would be everywhere. There are serious flaws to the theory and they were all beaten to death in an earlier thread. Basically, carbon fiber is a better insulator than steel. You have a very thin steel barrel liner wrapped in insulation. The company likes to tout the barrel as being slow to heat up. This is true, in a sense. The barrel in it's entirety is slow to heat up btu that is a function of the insulation (CF Wrapping) in fact, the barrel liner gets hotter faster than a conventional barrel would and retains the heat longer. We all know that barrel heat, particularly in the throat, is the enemy of barrel longevity. Too, once hot the barrel will stay hot longer, again thanks to the insulation. This means that where you would normally feel the barrel getting hot after 5 rounds of 300WM (say doing load development) with a conventional steel barrel, it will take longer for the same amount of heat to reach the surface of a CF-wrapped barrel. I don't know exact figures but I would estimate 15-20 rounds for the same surface heat. I think that knowledgeable riflemen and handloaders would concur that running 20 rounds through a 300WM without letting the barrel cool is not going to do the throat any favours. And if a person was to buy into using a CF-wrapped barrel to build a lightweight varmint rifle for high volume prairie dogs they would either have to build three to allow two to cool while you shot the third one, or accept the fact that a 22-250 would eat the liner out of the barrel in 1000 rounds, if not much less.

Now, this is not to say that a CF-wrapped barrel does not have it's advantages. They are very light and very stiff so the rifle should be accurate and would make a 24" or 26" barreled magnum a delight to carry. But the flip side is increased recoil and more difficulty in having the rifle "settle down" on target, particularly after climbing or running (flyweight rifle owners can confirm this phenomenon).

So all in all the concept of wrapping a barrel in carbon fiber is an interesting one but, in my opinion, more a marketing gimmick than a truly beneficial innovation, and this is evidenced by their scarcity.
 
Along with Huskemaw, more "Best of the West" hype, I guess all this BS from T.V. as well as all the BS in Magazines keeps new companies popping up with their "miracle" shooting products. I'm glad the deer and moose don't watch these programs!
 
It will kick the crap out of you!!!

The guys in the outdoors store in Whitecourt tried to talk me into believing the hype. I will agree that they "look" attractive, however in a magnum caliber you wont make more than a dozen shots before you develop a WICKED flinch.... Far to light for a rifle I think. If you can't walk around with 6 or 7lbs over your shoulder in the woods you may want to reconsider your hobby.

My $0.02 anyway...
 
+1 to Bcviking said.

I recently had a customer who was contemplating purchasing a carbon one custom with the SAKO action (a $700 option) which pushed the price to $4995 before taxes/shipping.

His dilemna was that after the purchase of the rifle, he didn't have enough money to buy the Z6 Swarovski scope that he had wanted for so long. He was considering buying a lesser scope and then upgrading in a year or so.

I asked him why he wanted the SAKO action and his response was something to the effect of he knew SAKO actions were smooth, reliable and of quality.

Next, I asked him if he'd compromise and buy the custom carbon one without the SAKO action and he said he really wanted the SAKO action. So then I asked him if the SAKO action is so important (at $700), then what are you paying $4295 for (i.e. the price of the gun without the action)? A lightweight stock? A carbon wrapped barrel?

Long story short, he purchased a SAKO Finnlight with the scope that he wanted and saved $1k over the price of just the CA.

To put another perspective on this, for less money, you can purchase something like a Blaser R8 Professional or Jaeger, or a Kimber + a scope, or a Cooper + a scope...
 
If what you want is a light firearm, get one.

If you hump around the country side on a sheep hunt, you'll be glad you had the light rifle. Browning makes a titanium model that is light.

Heard a story where a guy took a scale into Wholesale Sports in Grande Prairie on a quest for the lightest rifle. The Browning took it. A Tikka model was right behind it.

If the Christensen is what you want, get it. As for Big Ugly Man stating if the barrels were any good, they'd be everywhere....... Not everyone wants to spend $3000 on a hunting rifle. Its a niche market.

If you are a handgun guy, you remember what they said about Glocks.........
 
If what you want is a light firearm, get one.

If you hump around the country side on a sheep hunt, you'll be glad you had the light rifle. Browning makes a titanium model that is light.

Heard a story where a guy took a scale into Wholesale Sports in Grande Prairie on a quest for the lightest rifle. The Browning took it. A Tikka model was right behind it.

If the Christensen is what you want, get it. As for Big Ugly Man stating if the barrels were any good, they'd be everywhere....... Not everyone wants to spend $3000 on a hunting rifle. Its a niche market.

If you are a handgun guy, you remember what they said about Glocks.........

Tikka is a sako action and featherlight in one package. Not to mention a factory tack driver.
 
your totally right. i was thinking of getting a christensen arms but there way over priced. instead i got a cooper for half the price and I'm able to shoot under half moa. and i haven't put a good scope on it yet. i will be putting a nightforce on it soon and will still be spending less than a christensen.
 
Back
Top Bottom