Thanks buddy, that is the data I was starting with. I will just keep it at 4.5 or 4.6 and make the OAL a little bigger to avoid too high a pressure. Then when I go back to the round nose I will just back the powder back to just under 4 grns.
Sounds like you've got the right idea to me.
I don't reload 9, (only 45 ACP and 38 Sup) so I'm not particularly familiar with 9's. Without a chronograph X, you're really running blind. I'd get one of these on my Xmas list. They're really a necessary tool for reloaders.
Nuff about that.
Generally, heavier bullets and/or deeper seating = lighter loads.
Lighter bullets and/or shallow seating = heavier loads.
I personally find that the longer I can make my cartridges, (subject to their fitting mags and remaining electable), the better they feed. This holds well with theory, by the way, which proposes that longer cartridges = smaller angle of presentation = better feeding. Theories aside, it depends upon what your particular gun likes to eat. What works, works.
Why not try a half dozen dummies (no powder, no primer) that are a few 100ths "
longer" than posted max COL. Test em to make sure they still 1) run well in your mag 2) pass the clunk test and 3) will eject when you cycle em. I'd expect such a cartridge would run trouble free and safely within all published load ranges.