VZ-58/CZ-858 optics mount - foiled again!

Flying Beaver

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
43   0   0
*Rant On*

So, I put an ad in the EE looking for a VZ-58 scout mount, in order that I could mount my Bushnell holosight on my folding-stock VZ-58. That particular sight, which I had on hand, seemed like an ideal match for the short-barreled VZ-58 (CZH-2003, to be more precise). This was my first rifle of this family (I've got a few more now); I have used it with iron sights only for several years. But, I'm getting older and so are my eyes. Time for some upgrading.

After placing my EE ad, I received a PM from a company making a new type of scout mount, different from the traditional one that has been floating around for several years. Would I be interested in one?

So, I PM'd back - yes, I'd be interested in one, like to see some pictures and get shipping costs. The company very kindly did several photos of their new scout mount for the 58/858 and posted them on CGN, and very graciously responded to my query with a quote for mount plus shipping. I have nothing but praise for their efforts to answer my questions.

I had also heard good things about the new company's tactical bolt release, and thought it would be nice if I could order one at the same time. The response to that was that they were sold out, but that another CGN site sponsor was selling a combo pack of the tac bolt release and an extended mag release at a special summer sale price.

My only problem there was that I already have extended mag releases, and had no use for another. I'm also on a fixed disability pension, so spending the extra cash for an un-needed piece was a factor.

In the meantime, several other people tried this new scout mount and have given it very good reviews. Bravo!

Also in the meantime, I had a bit of bad luck and wound up in hospital for several days, and then had a big family wedding. So, it was about two weeks before I was able to follow up on the scout mount.

After first sending a PM and then an e-mail, I did get a polite response from the company who had initially offered me the new-type scout mount. It contained the unfortunate (for me) news that they had sold their entire stock of mounts to a major Canadian firearms wholesaler and had none left to sell me.

Now, yes, my bad for getting myself put into hospital and attending my nieces wedding instead of attending to purchasing firearms accessories.

In hindsight, I should have jumped all over the new mount without pausing to draw breath. But, life is what it is, and circumstances intervened, and it's history.

And, if the company who have developed the new type scout mount had an offer from a major distributor that they couldn't refuse, that's a real piece of good luck for them. Product sold, cash in the bank. Amen. Score one for the guy with the better product. I'm a big fan of successful private enterprise.

However, I am left with one "Arrgghh" and it is this:

What do I have to do to get an optics mount for my VZ-58 and CZ-858's? :bangHead:

It would appear that the latest entry on the scout mount scene is no longer available from its originator - for now, at least. :( Will that change? Unknown at this point.

Perhaps the major eastern wholesale distributor that bought the entire stock will make them available to retailers, or perhaps they will be an accessory available when new stocks of these rifles are imported into Canada. Either way, the eastern wholesaler does not deal directly with the retail customer. I have direct experience with this company and know that for a fact.

In any case, even if the new scout mounts do become available again, they are useful only for holosights, red dots, or small reflex sights, not for a full size scope.

* * * * * * * * * * FULL SIZE OPTICS

Over the years we in "Red Rifles" have discussed many different methods that have been or can be used to mount optics of various types to the VZ-58/CZ-858 family of rifles. All of these are written up in the excellent FAQ put together by Curtton and posted here as a sticky. :D

Many thousands of CZ 858's and VZ-58's, straight from the CZ factory, have been sold in Canada. I suspect very few owners of these rifles would be prepared to sell them off at fire-sale prices and then re-purchase their collection from the CSA catalogue, just because CSA has an integral east-bloc optics mount rail.

Prior to the CSA versions of these rifles becoming available, with an east-block side mount already attached as standard equipment, numerous work-arounds were put forth. As well, a couple of different manufactured solutions have come and gone.

The only one still available, to my knowledge, is the NEA/Neit Arms Cantilever rail mount. This device requires removal of the factory stock and use of a collapsible AR-15/M4 stock; the cantilever is a picatinny/weaver rail that extends forward approximately to the front edge of the rear dust cover. This was to be a three part system: 1) the adapter block that bolts to the receiver, 2) the cantilever rail that mounts to the adapter block, and 3) a casing deflector that integrates into the system. Still waiting for part "3" to appear after a great many months. I was one of the first buyers of the cantilever setup.

Some of the "home brew" methods involved adding rails at the fore-end.

Several companies now offer replacement furniture - hand guards and covers - with integral rails. All of these are good for adding red-dot or reflex sights, and some people have even experimented with adding small very-long-eye-relief scopes. I've got a couple of sets of replacement furniture for the CZ-858's from different makers, both very high quality and worth the money. I've got one unmodified, except for a muzzle brake - the original "beaver barf" I don't mind a bit.

Notable among the "home brew" ideas for full-size scopes are two different (and both excellent) methods developed by CGN member Kasat - one a no-gunsmith bracket with an east-bloc side rail, and the other a no-gunsmith mount that puts a full-length picatinny rail from the rear of the receiver to the rear leaf sight mounting point. The latter mount had a quick removal feature, as well as a positive RTZ. Forum member Saitan also developed an ingenious CNC-machined mount that attached to the pistol-grip hard-point.

I find it surprising, after owning several of these excellent Czech rifles for several years, that the problem of mounting a full-length scope rail, not just a red-dot or BUIS mount - is still without a definitive solution that does not involve home or hired gunsmithing. :bangHead:

*Rant off*

Anyone care to offer a positive suggestion for going forward with an idea for mounting a full-size optic?

("Drop Dead A*hole, F*&k Off, or "you're an idiot" don't fall into that category and will be ignored :sniper:).
 
Last edited:
Which is why I put in the very first line of my post,
"in order that I could mount my Bushnell holosight on my folding-stock VZ-58."

The issue of mounting a full-size scope is a separate problem.

I had forgotten that by the time I read to the bottom, I was distracted by something shiny.:p Removing the ability to use iron sights has never appealed to me so I haven't bothered with a scout mount.

You've summed it up pretty well. Other than buying a CSA with the side-rail installed, or at least drilled and tapped for one, there's no really great option out there for the home installation of a regular scope.

The NEA cantilever or the Kasat side rail are probably your two best bets, though both have limitations, particularly the need for a shell deflector.

The design of the VZ just doesn't lend itself to scoping, it's just the nature of the beast.

Don't discount the LER option. I had pretty good luck with this setup:

IMG_1594Medium.jpg
 
Ya I know I am waiting for that company to release there scout mount too. Me just like you was a little to late to the party. Although they did tell me that soon firearm stores across Canada will have them for sale. So I figure that it would atleast save me money on shipping. As for an optic Kassat, drill & tap plus the pistol grip are the only 1's I know of to date. Although there are a couple of company's that have made a full rail version but to many mod's were needed to be done to the rifle. I stopped making the full length rail after DaveMcFaul & I talked about the issue's to over come to create this type of mount. Plus me being a painter and not a machinist I figured a well if life serves you lemon's just make lemonaid.
 
I've built a full length rail for my 858 to put a full size scope on it and as soon as I test it for shell extraction ability, I will post some pics of it. Most likely doing that sometime this week.

This was how it looked originally but there was issues with the way the CZ/VZ's extract up and it used to jam every so often. I've since modified the area above the extraction point and moved the scope rail back and added a shell deflector. I'll let you know how it goes.
IMG_2856.jpg
 
I had forgotten that by the time I read to the bottom, I was distracted by something shiny.:p Removing the ability to use iron sights has never appealed to me so I haven't bothered with a scout mount.

You've summed it up pretty well. Other than buying a CSA with the side-rail installed, or at least drilled and tapped for one, there's no really great option out there for the home installation of a regular scope.

The NEA cantilever or the Kasat side rail are probably your two best bets, though both have limitations, particularly the need for a shell deflector.

The design of the VZ just doesn't lend itself to scoping, it's just the nature of the beast.

Don't discount the LER option. I had pretty good luck with this setup:

IMG_1594Medium.jpg

Stevo,

Thanks for the pic.
I forgot to mention the NEA cantilever in my original post (now added). I bought one of the first ones they made, complete with AR stock adapter, and I'm not wild about it, though they're very well made.

Part of the reason is that it's a cantilever, and it's short length is to minimize the end "boinging" up and down. I dislike the AR stock, and I think they could have made an adapter block that would have accepted the factory "beaver barf" stock or the factory folder. I wish/feel these stocks could have been used in mounting a cantilever rail, and if I had a milling machine I'd prove it (or try to).

The other thing I don't like is that NEA/Neit have been promising a case deflector that will integrate with their top rail system. (I originally said I thought the deflectors would not appear because of the pressure of other projects. I stand corrected on this - Charles Martel has posted that the NEA/Neit deflectors are the next item on their "do" list. Apologies to Charles.)

My current case deflector is a $12 Marstar special modified a la Curtton's method in the FAQ. One nice thing is that it's robust and moves easily between rifles; the other is that it was dirt cheap.

I came across a 2-6x28 (or so) LER pistol scope in my drawer the other day; bought it with a used pistol as a package and never put it on - only use irons on pistols.

Your pic reminded me that that little puppy could be tried out on the fore-hand rail - it's certainly not doing any good sitting in a box.
Thanks,
Jim
 
Last edited:
Ya I know I am waiting for that company to release there scout mount too. Me just like you was a little to late to the party. Although they did tell me that soon firearm stores across Canada will have them for sale. So I figure that it would atleast save me money on shipping. As for an optic Kassat, drill & tap plus the pistol grip are the only 1's I know of to date. Although there are a couple of company's that have made a full rail version but to many mod's were needed to be done to the rifle. I stopped making the full length rail after DaveMcFaul & I talked about the issue's to over come to create this type of mount. Plus me being a painter and not a machinist I figured a well if life serves you lemon's just make lemonaid.

Jeez, for a painter you turned out a pretty trick mount with that one that attaches at the handgrip :D

I will bet money that a block could be made to bolt to the back of the receiver. To this block would bolt

a) standard beaver barf stock, using its existing bolt

b) factory folder, using its existing bolt

c) aftermarket adjustment (inline/angled) & folding blocks to fit an aftermarket fixed or folding stock (the Ace AK stock or one very like it - I forget now)(what company is it that's making these multi-position blocks?) , or

d) an adapter to accommodate an AR stock option. I have one that is a flat plate with a threaded pipe welded to it, and a hole through the flat plate
with a factory stock mounting bolt supplied.

Also to this block would mount either a cantilever rail, as in the current NEA/NEIT design, or the rear end of a very stiff rail that would run over the rear half of the rifle, incorporating a case deflector, and fasten at the front either to the rear sight leaf mount, or even further forward to another hardpoint, maybe even a barrel clamp.

If I owned either a TIG welder or a milling machine (preferably both), I would build it. Dave McFaul's idea was on the right track, as was Kasat's Opus #2.
 
The LER setup I pictured is a cheap (really cheap) NCStar 4x on the old Infratek handguard. I bought the scope primarily to test the concept, and it worked out surprisingly well. Shots on 18" steel plates are boringly regular out to 400m and still not too hard at 500m.

I never tried it on an NEA handguard as I only had low rings on hand when I bought the scope. The NEA would probably require at least medium, possibly high rings if you want the lens of the scope over the rear sight.
 
I've built a full length rail for my 858 to put a full size scope on it and as soon as I test it for shell extraction ability, I will post some pics of it. Most likely doing that sometime this week.

This was how it looked originally but there was issues with the way the CZ/VZ's extract up and it used to jam every so often. I've since modified the area above the extraction point and moved the scope rail back and added a shell deflector. I'll let you know how it goes.
IMG_2856.jpg

Very interesting. I will look forward to seeing your pictures. I hope you will make up a sketch with some dimensions, and do some closeup photos of your mountng points.

Thanks,
Jim
 
Not a scout mount but these mounts work well with red dots.

IMG_3253.jpg

Yes, they work very well. Unless I am mistaken, the rifle in your picture is a model made by CSA, which comes with the east-bloc optic mount built in.

For those of us who bought our firearms from the original makers, the Czech company CZ, that side rail is not an option for several reasons.
1) The receiver walls on the original rifles have been milled as thin as possible to save weight, and there is not enough thickness to make a successful tapped mounting.
2) A reinforcement plate can be made up and be welded, rivited, or bolted to the receiver. The east-bloc mount is then attached to that reinforced plate.
3) Steps 2 and 2A require the services of a qualified gunsmith who is familiar with the rifle, in order that the mounting be correctly located on the receiver, and that the mount not interfere with the cycling of the rifle action.

Other than that, it's a fine idea.
 
My rifle is made by CZ, I bought it from Wolverine about three years ago. The receiver is not tapped but the rail the mount clips onto is.


IMG_3980.jpg


IMG_3984.jpg


Over two crates of Czech surplus without a problem
 
Last edited:
The other thing I don't like is that NEA/NEIT have been promising a case deflector that will integrate with their top rail system. Now they're caught up in building an AR, and I suspect it'll never happen

As soon as the AR is launched next month there are a whole pile of projects that will run. The traveller for the deflector is cut and sitting by a machine to go.
 
My rifle is made by CZ, I bought it from Wolverine about three years ago. The receiver is not tapped but the rail the mount clips onto is.


IMG_3980.jpg


IMG_3984.jpg


Over two crates of Czech surplus without a problem

Thanks very much for the additional info.

Your other picture shows your rifle more clearly. Sorry for the mis-identification of your rifle :redface: - in the original photo the finish appears much darker than the grey/blue finish on my own Czech models. My bad.

You drilled and tapped the rail for screws & drilled the receiver with plain holes, then used screws from inside the receiver?

Seeing the rail up close, it looks something like the Zenit universal rail available from one of the distributors of scopes made in Belarus (not a site sponsor so will leave the name out) and from some Canadian distributors?

I'm curious as to how you decided the correct place to put the rail, and to drill the matching holes in the receiver. Did you use the scope mount bracket and find the best spot for a good sight line by experiment?

My biggest concern with trying to do this at home has always been how to find the correct location for the rail and the mounting holes without interfering with the action, and without making extra "oops" holes in the side of the receiver.

Thanks for the nice pics,
F B
 
The LER setup I pictured is a cheap (really cheap) NCStar 4x on the old Infratek handguard. I bought the scope primarily to test the concept, and it worked out surprisingly well. Shots on 18" steel plates are boringly regular out to 400m and still not too hard at 500m.

I never tried it on an NEA handguard as I only had low rings on hand when I bought the scope. The NEA would probably require at least medium, possibly high rings if you want the lens of the scope over the rear sight.

The LER scope I got with the pistol package is either a low-end BSA or a low-end Leapers. 1" tube. Not what you'd call hi-quality glass.
I would think you're right about the ring height - the sight-line of even a small diameter scope would have to clear the rear leaf sight. Have to see what kind of rings I have in the tickle trunk.
 
Back
Top Bottom