Any non-restricted .223 / 5.56 AR's out there???
- Thread starter KMAX
- Start date
I'm sorry, somewhere in all the sarcasm I thought we were all of the agreed upon notion that assault rifles don't actually exist, but are in fact a myth perpetuated by those belonging to the anti-gun establishment.
I have never met another firearms owner who describes these firearms as "assault rifles". In other posts XX has indicated he is a fan of these types of firearms now he is using the term assault rifle.
Strange behaviour from someone who claims to be specifically interested in "Black Rifles" yet approves of ATT's. Especially since some want to restrict more Black Rifles.
Search his posts.
Lets get the terms correct.
AR = Armalite, not Assault Rifle.
Assault Rifle = Select fire rifle firing an intermediate cartridge, which we can not legally own/discharge in today's political climate.
Assault Weapon = A made up gun grabber term to demonize any firearm that is modern, effective and utilitarian.
AR = Armalite, not Assault Rifle.
Assault Rifle = Select fire rifle firing an intermediate cartridge, which we can not legally own/discharge in today's political climate.
Assault Weapon = A made up gun grabber term to demonize any firearm that is modern, effective and utilitarian.
Further to that, while your post from Wikipedia is correct in establishing what an "assault" rifle is, it's published on wikipedia, and, if you were to replace the word "assault" with "Military Service", it would in fact be accurate, instead of a means to further perpetuate the slang "assault rifle"
Close to AR (or can be made to look close to AR) Kel-Tec Su16f
I want all the OIC's against black rifles rescinded. You are just far too paranoid. I approve of ATT's for restricted guns. I do NOT approve of what guns are currently restricted, I do not think AR-15 should be a restricted gun in it's semi form.
Edit: If you want to discuss this further please PM me. Let's not hijaack the guy's thread, he is looking for information.
To answer the OP again without raising the ire of the super-paranoid again:
There are a lot of semi-automatic non-restricted rifles that are based very closely on assault rifles, but they are not assault rifles because they lack the select fire feature.
I gave the list in post #6. Many of them differ from the military assault rifle version only in slight modifications to their fire control mechanism so that they are not capable of fully automatic fire.
The Swiss Arms Classic Green, for example, is virtually identical to the Swiss SIG 550 assault rifle. It is modified to be capable of only semi-automatic fire but in other respects is very, very similar, sharing many identical parts.
There are a lot of semi-automatic non-restricted rifles that are based very closely on assault rifles, but they are not assault rifles because they lack the select fire feature.
I gave the list in post #6. Many of them differ from the military assault rifle version only in slight modifications to their fire control mechanism so that they are not capable of fully automatic fire.
The Swiss Arms Classic Green, for example, is virtually identical to the Swiss SIG 550 assault rifle. It is modified to be capable of only semi-automatic fire but in other respects is very, very similar, sharing many identical parts.
NO, it only looks similar
Please refrain from spreading nonsense.
Its is made different not modified.
Bolt carrier = different from 55X.
Upper receiver = internally different, does not accept 55X bolt carrier.
Lower receiver = different dimensions, cannot accept 55X trigger group.
And the list goes on.
And stop using that stupid fu*king term!!
youthshooter
Regular
+1.
