CFSAC 2012 - What do you wanna see?

I miss going to CFSAC.

Seeing as this is a public forum, I'll put forward that I would like to see former CF members be allowed to participate in CFSAC again, through the DCRA or other club affilition (for insurance).

Perhaps suitablility of equipment, fitness level etc. determined at the discretion of the CRO if that is the problem.
 
Dirt Diver I am looking forward to seeing what lies instore for next year. I think alot of the stuff you and I talked about this year is a good start. I want guys to remember that this is a competition, but to remember that we are all shooters and that sportsmanship is a big part of this comp. Like I said, this year let's keep the fun matches fun!! Plus all the stuff I mentioned in my AAR to you. If by any chance you need any more input you know how to get ahold of me.
 
Quiet said:
I miss going to CFSAC.

Seeing as this is a public forum, I'll put forward that I would like to see former CF members be allowed to participate in CFSAC again, through the DCRA or other club affilition (for insurance).....
Click to expand...

You know, at one time, in order to compete in DCRA matches some sort of relationship with the CF/RCMP was pretty much required.

Don't know why an ex-serviceman shooting a privately owned box stock 20" AR topped with an Elcan shooting C77 equivalent ammunition shouldn't be allowed to compete, subject to liability coverage as you have suggested.

As a matter of fact, I recall such a competitor doing pretty well at NSCC this summer.;)
 
Perhaps a 3 gun match? Carbine, Shotgun, and Pistol? I'd like to see the "CQB" match less static. Keep the seperate stages, but rather then stopping at the end of each stage, make it one fluid & timed match so that weapons handling is just as important as shooter accuracy.
 
I would happily skip the shotgun it would just be another weapon to train guys on and everyone knows even if we get one it would be one and that makes training a real PITA.

Now a couple machine gun matches say a 600m deliberate and a 300m mover match done in pairs would be interesting.
 
For a sample rulebook, have a look at the one for NSCC. I see the DCRA no longer has the 2011 version on their website, but if you go to www.osacanada.ca, click on events, scroll to the bottom of the page, there is a link to the 2010 NSCC Rulebook.
This will give a good idea of what a comprehensive rulebook is like for mational level matches. Now this rulebook was developed over a period of years, but it is an excellent example of what a rulebook is like.
The group planning for CFSAC 2012 should consider the importance of having a comprehensive rulebook available well before the event.
 
tiriaq said:
For a sample rulebook, have a look at the one for NSCC. I see the DCRA no longer has the 2011 version on their website, but if you go to www.osacanada.ca, click on events, scroll to the bottom of the page, there is a link to the 2010 NSCC Rulebook.
This will give a good idea of what a comprehensive rulebook is like for mational level matches. Now this rulebook was developed over a period of years, but it is an excellent example of what a rulebook is like.
The group planning for CFSAC 2012 should consider the importance of having a comprehensive rulebook available well before the event.
Click to expand...

We had one in 2009 and 2010 but for some reason this year no rule book. I have copies of 09 and 10 here at home. Something about too much money to print off copies for the teams but someone had it in their head and that was all that mattered.......
 
If printing cost is an issue, then the thing could be made available on disc or online. Minimal cost, and anyone or any team could print a paper copy as desired.
Of course, someone would have to undertake to draft the rulebook, or at least revise what is already available.
A rulebook that exists only in a RO's head is hardly acceptable.
 
...but that might result in an unfair competition and make us look bad!

I would like to stop disqualifying shooters that have travelled across the country or the world to be there (especially when DQ is based on variable rules in an RO's head).

I'd like to see less focus on surprise CQB matches and more marksmanship and promotion of shooting for the CF.

Before I get crucified for my CQB comments - I've been to Afghanistan twice and shot for 20 years. IMHO, if you can shoot well at 500 m in the wind at connaught, the transition to CQB is not so hard. You can't take CQB skills back to 500.

Speed is important, but not as important as accuracy. You can't miss fast enough to win a gunfight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom