VZ58 - polymer vs aluminum forends?

sixty9santa

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
36   0   0
I'm slowly building up one of my projects, the VZ58.
I was wondering how the Fab Defence polymer forends are holding up?

I will be using a red dot sight out to 200m and would like to know if the obvious applies and to steer clear of polymer.
 
Fore stock

I have put The fab, The NEA and the BC Tactical fore stocks through some serious abuse on fighting and CQB rifle courses. Thousands and Thousands of rounds.

I run the BC Tactical railed fore stock.

If you want a detailed breakdown as to why. PM me.

R.S
 
I have the Fab on one rifle and the NEA on the other. The Fab has held up to thousands of rounds with no issue... but I much prefer the feel of the NEA, not to mention the better top rail.

My next VZ will have the BC tactical setup though, just for kicks.
 
I have a Fab on one and the NEA on the other as well. The FAB holds up just fine, but I don't trust it to return to zero after a good cleaning and being removed. The NEA comes pretty darn close to zero after being removed and it allows you to co-witness with some red-dots (I am running the TRS25 on that one). The BC tactical one looks great, but co-witness would definitely be out. That isn't important to some folks though.
 
I didn't like my fab one because the Arms QR mount for my aim point would not clamp tight on it. I could rip the red dot right off after I lock the mount in place. And there is just too much movements for my liking. It looks good but I don't think it's good for monting on any optics.

I now use BC tactical's unit. I love it. Goes great with the rifle and absolutely solid mounting. And would maintain zero after disassemble.
 
BC Tactical rail with a Vortex SPARC was what I had in mind, just gkot a great deal going on for a FAB forend...

I do however, like their folding stock and grips.
 
Less is more.. less material, less price. And the choice of industry professionals. Best part.. Canadian made. How can you go wrong?

vz_afghan.jpg


206143_263310343694895_100000477958360_1147072_6566136_n.jpg


vz58_AAC762SD_1992.jpg
 
Less is more.. less material, less price. And the choice of industry professionals.

akfingeronthetrigger.jpg

...

Anyway, the Fab furniture is pretty nice and very light and is a good choice if you're not hanging any optics off it. If you are putting any glass on the front guard, you're wasting your money. Go with a solid, metal one if you want return to zero after cleaning.
 
Awesome pictures!
That is the folding stock and grips that I have on order.
Just need to order a BC Tactical rail, who stocks them?
 
I wish nea rail was flat at tHe bottom. I like bc tactical rail more. But bc tac was pain in the ass tomget fitted on my vz 58. Its drop in on a 858 but i spend hours sanding the rail to fit on a vz 58. Worth the work. Both are great products. I just ordered a nea ar
 
Last edited:
BC Tactical all the way! Great quality and looks awesome. Love mine and would do it again if I had to. Wanstalls stocks a lot of them and offer great service.
 
I use a Tango Down Stubby.
Why do you prefer the froward hand grip opposed to the AFG?
As I have tried my Tango Down shorty grip on this platform but I always found that my hand could never get a proper grip on it and when I would switich from carbine to pistol it would get hung up on my molle gear some times. Although I love these grips for my AR style platforms.
 
Why do you prefer the froward hand grip opposed to the AFG?
As I have tried my Tango Down shorty grip on this platform but I always found that my hand could never get a proper grip on it and when I would switich from carbine to pistol it would get hung up on my molle gear some times. Although I love these grips for my AR style platforms.

I liked the AFG on the VZ, but I swapped everything out to standardize all of my platforms.

I don't 'grip' them, I use them more as hand stops. The few times that I need to grip them while shooting (side prone or leaned corners) it gets the job done where the AVG didn't.
 
Back
Top Bottom