It will be slightly different for each bullet profile, but the main concern is that the bullet just not be touching the lands. In any 9mm load that will reliably feed, I doubt very much that you would have a significant enough gap to effect accuracy. As well, if you go too short you will be dealing with excessive pressure.re: loaded length, being that all of the bullets have a different shape, I would think that the distance the bullet shoulder is off the lands would be a consideration, Would it not???
thanks
It depends on the matches you attend. Majors will often have targets out to fifty meters, miini-poppers or difficult partials. In those cases you need to know the bullet will go precisely where you aim it. 4" @ 25 gets to be 8" @ fifty, which is a pretty wide margin for error and means you will be firing "hopers" for the most part. The more accurate the gun and load combination is, the better.imho you dont need a very accurate handgun to shoot ipsc. i woudlnt shoot a course of fire any better with a gun that shoots 1" at 25m than one that shoots 4" at 25m. just my opinion. well...i will say that the only exception to that is when you have a small steel at 25m+ which certainly doesn't occur all to often.
Problem is where you are looking for speed. If you think that fast doubles are the way to quick times, I guarantee you will never have quick times.While a 1 inch group from a Ransom Rest would be nice it's likely tighter than most service pistols will produce. And at its heart the Shadow is still a lightly warmed over service pistol. As such I'd say anything around 2 inch or tighter for groupings at 25m would be OK.
Something that's been touched on but not stressed enough is how the ammo shoots with you. You'll need to follow up your load testing from the rest to see which allows you to shoot the best in terms of effective double taps so you can pick up a few hundreths here and there on the closer in targets at least.
It's been my experience that the scoring system rewards faster shooting with adequite accuracy moreso than excellent accuracy with slower but still respectable times. Of course if you can combine the two then you'll be bumped up quickly....![]()
Problem is where you are looking for speed. If you think that fast doubles are the way to quick times, I guarantee you will never have quick times.




























