Tick
The new "Japchesters" as they have been referred to earlier, are of outstanding quality, I purchased the 92 SRC in 44 and I can tell you it functions flawlessly. Fit and finish are better than almost any rifle out there today including pre 64's of which I own over 30. I have handled the new 94 and it appears to hold all the same virtues as my 92. I was looking for an old B92 when I saw the new winchester and forgot about the B92 immediately. These are some of the best made rifles money can buy and I don't give a rats a$$ where they are made, you have to give them their due, they are beautiful. The 44 mag is one of the most difficult cartridges to get to feed smoothly 100% of the time and my 92 does, with jacketed or cast. The 94 should be even smoother in the 30-30. If you would like a new one go right ahead and buy one with confidence that you are getting a finely made firearm that is worth the money.
This is only my experienced opinion.
For you detractors out there, your biases are showing !!! How can you badmouth a rifle you have not personally tried or possibly even seen, I challenge you to go to your local shop and pick one up and cycle it and fondle it and scutinize it, check the fit and finish, quality of wood etc. then come back and tell me it's a piece of s&&t.
The question Tick asked was are they good quality, not whether a lever gun is worth 1200 dollars or not, and my answer is a WHOLEHEARTED YES, exceptional quality.
I must beg to differ with the Mossberg reference, the mossberg and marlins although possibly functional (sometimes) are not in the same circles as these rifles. That's like comparing a cooey to an anschultz!!!