So from your post on most ethical and most effective, do tell me...
What rifle or calibre would be more effective or more ethical than a 30-30 inside 100 yards...
Not only do people need to do what's ethical and effective in killing an animal, they have to figure out what is most ethical, and most effective now? Beyond the requirement of being ethical, most ethical or most effective is dependent on the individual not the gun they shoot. I know people who are far more effective with a 243 on elk, than others with a 300 wsm.
So which is more ethical?
With my definition of effectiveness being death of the animal, and my definition of ethical being, a humane death, I can't see how something can be more effective or more ethical than something that is effective and ethical. Of course we assume that all would be legal
If I kill a doe with a single shot bang flop, is thre some was I could have been more ethical? Effective?
If I consistently do this with margin of error that the entire hunting population, wounds or loses an animal, is there something I should be doing to be more effective or ethical?
A deer shot in the vitals with a 30-30 or. 375 H&H, at 100 yards is a dead animal.
Is one more dead the other...more ethical...more effective?
Gut shoot the animal with either and you missed your target. If it was within your range and comfort zone, the shot was still an ethical one as the gun was capable of killing the animal with a vital hit, but it just didn't happen.
So this is where some begin the debate,...the bigger gun is better for when you screw up.
Nope, that's trying to get an insurance policy for your mistake. The ethics or lack of ethics on your part in taking a shot that results in a poor hit trumps any ethics you may attribute he cartridge.
Please post in the thread rather than editing a previous post bud... I didn't even find this till just now...
All I will say is this... If you can consistantly bang flop that deer with whatever you are using at whatever range you limit yourself to then so be it.... completely ethical.... and nobody is pushing taking a bad shot with any caliber... This thread is not about shot placement... it's a styraight up caliber and rifle question... I am not arguing ethics... I am arguing what is best for that boy's first rifle
The OP's kid, on the other hand, has never shot a deer.... has never practiced with a centerfire and the OP himself stated that he "assumed" the shots would be under 100 yards.... I still don't think 30-30 is best choice based on action type, limited potential for growth and experience level of teh shooter..... If it were my son I would be buyhing something that could grow with him as a hunter instead of having to upgrade later on....