What caliber for Timberwolf?

Underthegun

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
140   0   0
Location
Emo,ON
I am looking for a good wolf load. I think the 243 would be great, but I am worried about pass throughs. I would like a 223 but it probably isn't powerful enough. Any thoughts or opinions?
 
Well a .223 worked for my buddies kid on a 100 lb male........anything you would use on a deer works
 
Why are you worried about passthroughs ? Is hide damage an issue ? Bullet selection is key, almost regardless of calibre.

Hide damage is not an issue for me so I typically use 308 or 300WM. Overkill is the best kind of kill.
 
Why are you worried about passthroughs ? Is hide damage an issue ? Bullet selection is key, almost regardless of calibre.

Hide damage is not an issue for me so I typically use 308 or 300WM. Overkill is the best kind of kill.
. Yes I was thinking about damage to the hide.
 
Why are you worried about passthroughs ? Is hide damage an issue ? Bullet selection is key, almost regardless of calibre.

Hide damage is not an issue for me so I typically use 308 or 300WM. Overkill is the best kind of kill.

Timber wolf pelts went for as high as $920.00 on the most recent fur auction held in North Bay. So blowing the snot out of them might not be such a good idea.
 
Timber wolf pelts went for as high as $920.00 on the most recent fur auction held in North Bay. So blowing the snot out of them might not be such a good idea.

Wow, that certainly makes it worth while to go hunting for them!!
 
Wow, that certainly makes it worth while to go hunting for them!!

Yup, up in the Arctic, as that's the wolves that fetch those prices (avg. $400). Our Timber wolves typically average around $150 which is still pretty good.


I am looking for a good wolf load. I think the 243 would be great, but I am worried about pass throughs. I would like a 223 but it probably isn't powerful enough. Any thoughts or opinions?


I've shot wolves with all sorts of calibers and bullets. I like Barnes TSX, they don't make a huge hole as they don't desintegrate and can be used for deer and wolves in the same load. The 85 gr. TSX would work well in your 243.
 
Most of the people I know who shoot wolves just use watever big game rifle they have in hand. I've got one at home here that was put down with a .375 H&H shooting a Grand Slam and the pelt looks great, and I know for a fact there are lots of really nice wolf rugs out there that were shot with medium magnums. Not that it is needed, but I would not pass on a wolf just because I was holding my .338 win mag, or whatever.

If I was shopping for a rifle specifically for wolf, I'd go for something in the .25-06 or 6.5x55 range that could throw bullets that are a bit heavier and can buck the wind better than the centerfire .22's.
 
The last wolf I shot was on the 27th of October of last year. I killed it with a single headshot at 90 yards with my Sako varmint 222, 20.5/IMR4198/50 Sierra Blitz. It was an adult female~100 pounds. Must admit I felt a wee bit under gunned as I was after coyotes. All other wolves I have taken were shot while moose or deer hunting with calibres reflecting those species.
 
PB100562.jpg
drilled this 85 lb female at 90 yards watching a cutline for elk with a 9.3x62 - 286gr Hornady handload.........Harold
 
The last wolf I shot was on the 27th of October of last year. I killed it with a single headshot at 90 yards with my Sako varmint 222, 20.5/IMR4198/50 Sierra Blitz. It was an adult female~100 pounds. Must admit I felt a wee bit under gunned as I was after coyotes. All other wolves I have taken were shot while moose or deer hunting with calibres reflecting those species.
Don't imagine the Inuit who have been using .222's on seal,caribou,walrus and even polar bear gave it a second thought.Just don't miss...........Harold
 
Wolves

I have taken 5 only but they are usually a TOO (target of opportunity)to me,
I've taken one with 243 90gn speer, 2 with 7 Mag, 1 with 338 and 250 Sierra (big hole) and 1 with 340 and 250 Part. I have specifically hunted them to no avail but always took my 243 and nowadays I would load a TTSX or 95 Partition for minimum hide damage and good range and killing power. IMHO
 
Don't imagine the Inuit who have been using .222's on seal,caribou,walrus and even polar bear gave it a second thought.Just don't miss...........Harold

Yeah, the Inuit thing always comes up when minimum calibers get mentioned.
While they do use very small calibers for most species, we should remember that the terrain is devoid of any cover and vegetation making a tracking job very simple. As far as aquatic mammals are concerned, they either die too quickly and sink out of sight never to be recovered or like the preferred method with walrus, they wound them in the water so they go to rest on ice floes and then head shoot them when on the ice.
 
If you have a .243, that would be my suggestion, I think it would be about perfect as a wolf cartridge. 80 gr. bullets would penetrate adequately, and likely not exit. You could use 100 gr. if you don't mind sewing a bit.
 
Back
Top Bottom