Please help me choose between 3 scopes

["J" man]

Hi, would love to mount a scope for my 10/22. Will be used for hunting, not punching paper. Do not plan to shoot more than 100 yards, it's just a .22LR. What is the best value from the following 4 scopes? They are all roughly the same price (around $200). My main concern is durability/holding zero. Second concern is finding a scope with a forgiving nature when positioning your eye to see through it.

~$200 scopes:
(1) Mueller APV 4.5-14x40AO (min. 10 yard adjustable parallax)
(2) Leupold VX-I 2-7x28 rimfire (60 yard parallax)
(3) Nikon Prostaff II 3-9x40 rimfire BDC 150 reticule (50 yard parallax)
(4) Vortex Diamondback 2-7x35 rimfire (50 yard parallax)

Are Leapers/UTG bases/rings good enough to use, or should I be going with something more higher end? Any experience with Leapers/UTG?

Thanks a million,
"J" man

 

[caramel]

Redfield Revolution Accurange 4X12X40, 230.00, very clear and reliable scope... Cheers. JP.

 

["J" man]

Redfield Revolution Accurange 4X12X40, 230.00, very clear and reliable scope... Cheers. JP.

But it's a 100 yard parallax? Isn't that bad if you're putting it on a 10/22 rimfire?

 

[cam1936]

But it's a 100 yard parallax? Isn't that bad if you're putting it on a 10/22 rimfire?

It would be a pain in the ass, especially for a gopher gun. I like the Redfield scopes, but for a .22 go with something with a AO or a 50m-70m parallax

 

[Crashman]

I have had nothing but great service from my Vortex Diamondback scopes. I do not have the rimfire version, but all the other scopes I have are excellent.

 

["J" man]

I wounder if the regular and rimfire versions of 2-7x35 diamondback are exactly the same except for parallax setting. Do you know if these scopes are produced in the Philippines or China? If it's China, I'll pass.