reliable .22 pistols.

[Ballox]

Rugers are not much to look at but they are more durable and reliable than that damned pink Energizer bunny.
.

Are they as reliable as a pink beaver ?

 

[trebor2880]

Don't rule out the Norinco M-93.

Other than being a little on the small side, it is excellent value for the money.

 

[Ballox]

Don't rule out the Norinco M-93, it is excellent value for the money.

So is a one legged hooker, but who really wants one ! LOL

 

[travellerw]

Hey don't knock the M-93.. I have shot 1000s of rounds through mine and never had any issues. Not one single FTF or FTE.

Let me hear that about another sub $200 gun.

Its more like a chubby girl. Fun to ride, just don't let your friends see you.

 

[trebor2880]

So is a one legged hooker, but who really wants one ! LOL

You may laugh about the quality of a Norinco,

but have you taken a look at their newly produced firearms?

Deep, rich bluing, that Colt themselves would envy,

and edges that would but Gillette's to shame.

 

[easysauce]

yeah get a ruger, i have one, initially i wanted a .22 conversion for my pistol, or somthing without the bull barrel look, (ruger 22/45, iron sights none of that stupid rail stuff i see now)

but once i shot it, I realised its done that way for good reasons.
and it ran reliably even with very little cleaning over 10k rounds, ( I still have yet to do more then a cloth and some CLP in the action, never even broken it down fully)

 

[noway123]

+1 on the Browning Buckmark, great pistol for 300, alot better than the M93 (rough), I have both.

 

[Ballox]

You may laugh about the quality of a Norinco,

Deep, rich bluing, that Colt themselves would envy

just like cheap chinese makeup that's full of lead LOL

 

[jackrabbit000]

x2 on the S&W 22a-1

 

[mmcintyre1220]

Spend more, get one of the best 22's on the market, the Sig 226 in 22, then you can get a kit for a 9/40/357sig... Have less clutter in your safe.

I hated the Ruger 22, it's grip is tiny, for those with large hands. Felt awkward shooting it.

I will put my buckmark up against any sig. IMO there are only 3 .22 semiauto pistols browning, ruger, beretta. Not in any order. The rest look nice but are not nearly reliable or accurate.

 

[trebor2880]

I will put my buckmark up against any sig. IMO there are only 3 .22 semiauto pistols browning, ruger, beretta. Not in any order. The rest look nice but are not nearly reliable or accurate.

Agreed.

High Standard is in a league of it`s own!

 

[AWOL]

 

[Tengoo]

I'm a Ruger fan. My MKII will probably outlive me...

Originally Posted by Ballox:
Just like women,there seems to be a reliability problem associated with the better looking ones.

What an awful misogynistic thing to say! [ROTFLMAO...]

 

[baldabe]

I have a Neos and a Buckmark. Both have been dead reliable and shoot accurately. The Neos has a red-dot (reflex style) on it and because of it is way more accurate for me. Neos is way easier to takedown and clean. Ultimately it is your own personal choices that will decide for you what you buy.
Good Luck.

 

[shredder]

Can't go wrong with a Buckmark Camper. For around $300, you get a reliable, accurate, and easy to clean pistol.

 

[trebor2880]

Great looking Browning Challenger for $450 on E.E.

 

[Mart0221]

My Buckmark Contour URX has never failed me. It's accurate and extremely reliable, better than any Timex I've ever owned

 

[4n2t0]

My Buckmark Contour URX has never failed me. It's accurate and extremely reliable, better than any Timex I've ever owned

Great pistol. I owned the practical URX model but they're all very good firearms.

 

[TacticalDan]

ruger mark 2

 

[st1264]

I will put my buckmark up against any sig. IMO there are only 3 .22 semiauto pistols browning, ruger, beretta. Not in any order. The rest look nice but are not nearly reliable or accurate.

If you have tiny hands and like ugly guns, go for it. I shot it and hated it. Worst ergonomics I've ever experienced, for me anyway.

Sig 226, not the Mosquito. OP try before you buy.