While I agree that the trigger parts should be properly hardened, how do you figure this is a major problem IN CANADA when you quote legal issues specific to AMERICA?
In Canada a semi-auto trigger that malfunctions and runs away is a safety issue but not a legal issue. Here, that is simply a malfunctioning trigger and would not result in legal problems.
The Americans and their ATF are totally insane for prosecuting people for untaxed full autos when the gun has not been converted with FA parts. That is simply government out of controll.
I made the comment that if the BATFE felt it was an offence with a likely chance of succesful prosection wouldnt you think the guys at NWEST or TPS guns and gangs wouldnt also have similar views?
In the US, if a semi-auto AR has a FA BCG installed, the firearm is classified as a machinegun, eventhough it is incapable of full automatic fire.
No it doesn't, otherwise buying a FA bolt carrier in the US would require a Form 4. "Ban" states may disagree, of course. Even then, it's the DIAS or the lower that is the 'Registered' NFA item.
Colt, BCM, Daniel Defense, all ship their rifles with FA bolt carriers from the factory.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that the newest batch sent to SFRC is clear of these issues, correct? I'm an AR newb here, and I have no clue on how to remove the bolt. The most I've done was to separate the upper and the lower
I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that the newest batch sent to SFRC is clear of these issues, correct? I'm an AR newb here, and I have no clue on how to remove the bolt. The most I've done was to separate the upper and the lower
I wouldn't make that assumption at all. For example, in the US you can be charged for posession of a machinegun even if the firearm is not full automatic. Take FA BCG's for instance. In the US, if a semi-auto AR has a FA BCG installed, the firearm is classified as a machinegun, eventhough it is incapable of full automatic fire.
On the other hand, a FA BCG installed in a semi-auto only AR in Canada is permissable as evidenced by the number of shooters asking for them here on this site.
I wouldn't make blanket statements, assumptions, or generalizations regarding firearms legislation between the US & Canada.
I made the comment that if the BATFE felt it was an offence with a likely chance of succesful prosection wouldnt you think the guys at NWEST or TPS guns and gangs wouldnt also have similar views?
Triggers & Hammers are forged. This is one of the reasons why there aren't a pile of manufacturing sources. And why custom hammer/triggers are expensive.
That being said, we're looking at options at having those made here as well.
YOu ever thought of selling your guns with a brand name trigger already in it like a Geiselle or similar? Could be a selling point in your favour.
Well I'm taking my NEA out tomorrow to test it's terminal performance. Will report any failures![]()
Yea, I'm a big NEA supporter too. Really it's more patriotic than anything else, and the price helped. I'm a little disappointed too that even though I sent my warrantee card in, just barely in time, within the 30 day window from date of purchase.
I haven't heard a thing about stiff trigger pulls, double fires, unstaked BCG's, from NEA directly - only on CGN, thanks guys. NEA says they want to fix every gun but it's CGN membership that brings these issues to light. So I look to CGN for "alerts" on potential issues with my NEA 15.
I will say that I had an issue with the forward rail and NEA handled it like real pros, so once a problem is bought to their attention they do take it seriously. I'll happily continue to support them based on that. Now I need to check my carbine for the above mentioned issues, thanks again to CGN.



























