I used one in Africa in 2010 and did a review of it when I got back. The scope itself was pretty good but I didn't like a few things about the reticle. First I found it impossible to turn the illuminationdown to a point where I didn't find it distracting. I don't like a really bright illuminated reticle so this was annoying to me. Second, while I like the concept of the illuminated triangle on top of the post, I found that it was too big. The illuminated portion should be 25% the size that it actually is (read this to mean that if you divide the reticle in half vertically, the top vertical half, 25% of the total area, is all that should be illuminated). I found that it had a tendency to draw my eye to the centre of the illuminated portion, sending my shots higher than I wanted. I believe this resulted in the wounding and loss of 2 hyenas (by my brother) and one baboon (my fault). A smaller illuminated portion would have reduced this tendency quite a bit. I wonder how the reticle with illuminated crosshair would have fared in the same situations? That said, this was a camp rifle and it was a 375 Ruger. The scope was new but was not living it's life as a safe queen, for sure. Seemed rugged enough and the glass was decent but I had some "fish eye" issues with the glass. Granted, being a camp rifle the eye relief might have been off for me and caused the problem, but I would definitely spend some time looking through them before I actually purchased one.