Raging Bull vs 629

graydog said:
I would like to see this so called established facts in writing from a creditable source.

Graydog
Click to expand...

I too would like to see some creditable information on how the Ruger is tuffer than the 629. When I search for information on Google all I find is people in the forums spouting off the same crap about the Smith being the weaker one with no real proof. Constintly saying the Ruger is stronger doesn't make it true.

629FTW.
 
Last edited:
If you need evidence of the Ruger being tougher than the Smith, look at the .44 magnum section in a reloading manual. I love my Smith, but the fact is that there will be loads in a modern manual that will state that they are intended for specific Ruger products ONLY.
 
johNTO said:
I looked at both the Raging Bull and the 629 when I was shopping for a .44mag
Ended up with a Ruger 4.2" Redhawk and love it! May get the 629 when the 4.2" is available.

DSCN0935.jpg
[/IMG]
Click to expand...

Dont hold ur breath on that one. I talked to Murray Charlton in BC about that and he is doubtfull it will happen.
 
460_Smith said:
If you need evidence of the Ruger being tougher than the Smith, look at the .44 magnum section in a reloading manual. I love my Smith, but the fact is that there will be loads in a modern manual that will state that they are intended for specific Ruger products ONLY.
Click to expand...

Freedom arms are supposed to be built extra tuff too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom