Nemesis 308 + 208 Match + 500 metres = Picture....

coyote said:
Caramel I also read about that, I don't doubt the groups in this thread as much as your previous thread about what you claim you shot at 200 and 300................
Click to expand...

How about accepting the fact that the poster ended up with one helluva rifle.
 
dizzy said:
The guy tries to back up the accuracy of the gun only to get hammered again. Nice to see Canadian gun nutz eat their own.
Click to expand...


This guy pulled the same thing with the TC series of rifles. He claimed that, when combined with a $250 Redfield scope, they were the most accurate rifles on the face of the planet, and since he purchased the tc icon Precison Hunter and Warlord he wrote that he no longer had any use for his multiple trg's with S&B optics and they were now sitting in the safe. Because of this, he was buying the entire calibre range of ICON rifles and had them on order from Wanstall's...... of course. What happened to all the ICON rifles?

Maybe it's a new phenomenon on this site, but there are product reps spewing bs claims all over the US gun forums, making unsubstantiated and utterly false claims about products. Can't believe so many of you are falling for it here. Come on, you know the velocities and accuracy claims are ludicrous.
 
dizzy said:
How about accepting the fact that the poster ended up with one helluva rifle.
Click to expand...

For $4500.00 it should be one hell of a rifle..........But keep in mind for roughly half that price you can get a rifle that will perform just as well........;)


dizzy said:
The guy tries to back up the accuracy of the gun only to get hammered again. Nice to see Canadian gun nutz eat their own.
Click to expand...

If you are going to make the type of accuracy claims he is making, and the way he comes across, it is not surprising that people are questioning his claims.........
 
Have you learned your lesson yet, JP? Have fun, enjoy your retirement, your toys, your shooting...but don't share it here! There's an endless supply of people with the time and inclination to sift through your old posts, calculate your ballistics for you on their programs looking for discrepancies, and generally piss on your parade.

JP, just keep on shootin'...and let them keep on computin'!
 
dizzy said:
How about accepting the fact that the poster ended up with one helluva rifle.
Click to expand...

It has very little to do with the rifle. I am sure its very accurate and he might have gotten a hummer. Get over it, no one said it is impossible.

HOW DID HE GET FROM POINT A TO POINT B???

What does he do to prep brass?
What does he measure his powder on? Lee Safety scale or what?
How is he calculating his dope?
Does he use a weather meter like a kestrel?
What were the wind conditions for bench rest sized groups in a tactical take down rifle???
Post a pic of the rifle in shooting position maybe.
What is working and why?

Perhaps one or two insignificant details might make people a little more accepting of his claims.

This is a pretty normal and accepted process in the real world called a Peer Review. He has made the claims and some people have call him out to at least provide a SHRED of fact to back up his claim. If the best defence you have is to post an ADD for the rifle or call someone a WII player then you are going to get some heat. Maybe if he had one thread and treated it as more of educational experience, hell even I might look into buying a Nemesis! But to post target pics every time you shoot and wait for everyone to stroke your ego is self serving at the least.

I have no doubt he may have made these groups and is an accomplished shooter. I personally think that is amazing. But if you can't take a little bit of heat being called out to show how you did these feats then maybe being in a public forum isn't for you.
 
dizzy said:
How about accepting the fact that the poster ended up with one helluva rifle.
Click to expand...

All of them? Either all of his guns shoot better then all other guns of the exact same make/model or he's a pathological liar. We'll know when it comes time for the MOA challenge.
 
jjohnwm said:
Have you learned your lesson yet, JP? Have fun, enjoy your retirement, your toys, your shooting...but don't share it here! There's an endless supply of people with the time and inclination to sift through your old posts, calculate your ballistics for you on their programs looking for discrepancies, and generally piss on your parade.

JP, just keep on shootin'...and let them keep on computin'!
Click to expand...

My opinion as well. Keep on shooting and posting JP and don`t let the nay sayers win.
 
CanuckWR said:

What does he do to prep brass?
What does he measure his powder on? Lee Safety scale or what?
How is he calculating his dope?
Does he use a weather meter like a kestrel?
What were the wind conditions for bench rest sized groups in a tactical take down rifle???
Post a pic of the rifle in shooting position maybe.
What is working and why?
Click to expand...


The OP has already stated that his powder charge is over the listed Maximum powder charge. and is compressed quite a bit...........:eek:

So IMO it would not be a good thing to use his load data........I don't care if there are no apparent over pressure signs.........going over the Maximum load is just asking for trouble..........I have seen what an overloaded charge will do........it could get really ugly.........
 
Maybe caramel will drive his new 2012 AMG c63 coupe to the shoot and teach everyone a thing or two with his Nemesis. Maybe he might not be able to make it, time will tell I guess.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom