Mount Sweetness
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Southern Ontario
garbage
You might be better off not listening.You will be doing the name calling if your unfortunate enough to get one.

Researching online, some Marlin workers were posting that 2008 was not really an issue, because although Marlin had been purchased by Remington, the same workers were doing the same jobs as they had all along. Apparently the guns with serial numbers beginning with 92 were pretty much unaffected, but the 91 series guns were staring to show the effects of the changes at the plant. Apparently the rifles assembled at the Remington plant really took a dive in quality.
Well it's only one rifle in the series, but my 1894 in .357 is numbered 9205119xx, and I am very happy with it. Fit and finish is good, it still has the Marlin target mark on the butt stock, and it cycles and feels great.
I believe that Remington has kept up the Marlin bullseye, so I don't know if I'd rely on that to determine whether the rifle is a good one or not. The bullseye is also only used on walnut stocked guns. Even old Marlins made with the stained hardwood stocks like the Glenfield 30s wouldn't have the bullseye and would be good quality.
The JM stamp is probably the most reliable way of determining whether a Marlin is pre-Remington or not.
While i don't have to worry about grizzly bears in ontario, i did have to worry about a brand new 336XLR in 35 Remington jamming up on me while moose hunting. 1000$ for a rifle and it has the "Marlin Jam"? F#*k was i ever mad. Add to that, the fact that i had to make a 13 hour round trip just to pick it up and you can see my frustration. I ended up bringing it back to the dealer, selling it back to them (at about a 300$ loss) and picked up a 30 year old Marlin in 35 remington and a savage 99 in 300sav. I was going to just bring it back to them and tell them i wanted an exchange or something but after the horror stories i've heard about dealing with Gravel (waiting a year or more for your rifle to be fixed or exchanged) i decided to cut my losses. Will i buy a marlin in the future? It's possible but only once they get their sh*t together.
Bunny...big mistake, garbage
I bought a new 39A in Feb. I went to the range with it probably... 6 times? Different ammo, different problems, various failures of all types, feeding, ejecting, extracting, you name it, it happened. It was a pile of rubbish and I thought I'd just cut my losses and sell it. I ended up calling The gravel agency, and they said that it was most likely a headspace problem and would most likely need to be replaced. I've sent them my gun, they've told me that they had non in stock and I said I'd just like a refund, they offered to reimburse me shipping as well (Approx 30 bucks). It was a reasonable response time, I sent the gun on the fourth and I got a response near the 20th. Although I still have yet to hear back about my reimbursement.
I also just bought 336XLR (but in 30-30 win) from Elwood Epps as a replacement/upgrade from the 39A. I was very impressed with Ellwood Epps speed in responses to inquiries and orders, definitely would order from them again.
However, I'm honestly anticipating getting it, cycling some snap caps through it, taking it to the range once getting some jams, and just phoning them up again and going through this whole schtick again. Its a shame because I hear from loads of people that Marlin's are supposed to be great quality and reliability. I have a weakness for leverguns and the XLR-line is particularily beautiful in my eyes. We'll just see how it goes. If it has any problems I'm definitely not hesitating to send it back.
garbage
This gun has only been fired around 25 rounds since new and has been a great shooter



























