It was my first gun too and I still have it and love it. Fun, cheap to buy and shoot,cool looking, and most importantly-- fun fun fun.
That being said... is it possible/advisable to buy one and "leave it alone" for a while until I feel ready to deal with it? I know a *lot* were made, but the good deals won't last forever.
Again, thank you everyone for your input. I must admit that while I still think that the SKS would be a very cool rifle to own, I'm not sure I want to start my riffle ownership with an epic battle with cosmoline... that and the realization what while I am going to get a .22 from my dad eventually, there is no time-line, perhaps I should start with the .22
That being said... is it possible/advisable to buy one and "leave it alone" for a while until I feel ready to deal with it? I know a *lot* were made, but the good deals won't last forever.
I disagree with the .22 for a first rifle, I've only started shooting about 4 months ago and my first gun was an SKS. I now own 3 of them including my Yugo. It's a great gun even for newbies, it's simple and reliable, the ammo is dirt cheap and you can shoot 200 rounds without worrying about recoil.
Some people try to make a big deal out of corrosive ammo but you should be giving your firearms a cleaning anyways, you don't have to strip it down but a few patches. After all these were built to used, abused, muddy etc. What you do at the range doesn't come close to what they were designed for or been through.
I'd be interested to hear your reasons for thinking that a .22 wouldn't be a good first rifle.
As for the SKS... the ammo isn't as cheap as .22. Also, if they are firing cheap dirty milsurp ammon its a gun that requires way more maintenance to keep clean, and if they don't do that, they risk a very dangerous slam fire. None of those things are great for the average gun newbie. The fact that an SKS is built for more than it will encounter at the range is also just another reason its not something essential to the range. Sure, they are fun to shoot. But there are WAY better first guns out there.
You could use a pellet gun for shooting and learn almost as much as you would learn with a .22 An SKS will teach you how to clean a gun, what slamfire is and how to avoid it (by cleaning your freefloating pin) and what it's like to shoot a real serious gun. The 7.62x39mm ammo is hard to beat at $205 for 1300 rounds. It's just a great, unbeatable deal especially for a beginner.

I'd be interested to hear your reasons for thinking that a .22 wouldn't be a good first rifle.
As for the SKS... the ammo isn't as cheap as .22. Also, if they are firing cheap dirty milsurp ammon its a gun that requires way more maintenance to keep clean, and if they don't do that, they risk a very dangerous slam fire. None of those things are great for the average gun newbie. The fact that an SKS is built for more than it will encounter at the range is also just another reason its not something essential to the range. Sure, they are fun to shoot. But there are WAY better first guns out there.




























