Well I suppose my firearms instructor may have been wrong.
Yup. And many others. It's pretty clear in the c.c. text I think.
It's one of the bigger urban legends of guns, and a pet peeve of mine.
It's beaten to death and many threads about it. Here's a particularly lengthy one if you care to read it. (also included a few police officers in the discussion). 122 posts.
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=746391
Or perhaps you have the right to refuse so long as you are in compliance and have proper documents.
Consider..... Yes officer I have firearms with me. No I will not show them to you. Who will win in the end?? (I'm not trying to sound like a smart-ass)
The cops would need justification to see your firearms during transport, no?
Absolutely.... I think telling the officer you are transporting firearms would open it up to an "inspection" for compliance of transport regs.
The last part of the c.c. I quoted says this...
Compliance with requirements
(13) Nothing in this section relieves a public
officer of criminal liability for failing to comply
with any other requirements that govern the
collection of evidence
Just make sure you are somewhere between your home and your range when you get stopped eh?
Definately. A prominent lawyer on this site says they are defending people charged with ATT violations fairly regularly for not being on a reasonably direct route.