While I tend to agree with H4831 on most of his experienced posting, I am
not totally in agreement with his "floating vs Pressure point" statement.
FWIW, His personal experience may be different than mine, so I am not saying
that he is wrong, only that my experience has led me to a different conclusion.
In my gun safes reside a large number of sporter weight, hunting rifles.
Only 3 have the pressure point intact, the rest are free floating.
I have a policy. Try the rifle as is, and observe how the groups look.
Not only group size, but group shape. [especially rifles that make two groups instead of one]
If it shoots well as is, I will not mess with it.
I have a M700 Classic in 300 Savage that has not been altered whatsoever.
It has the pressure point, and is unbelievably accurate for a factory rifle.
My 700 Classic in 8x57 made 2 groups about 1½" apart with the pressure point.
Floating that barrel and bedding the action brought the groups together to just at 1 moa average.
A Weatherby Vanguard in 30-06 went from 2½" vertical groups to ¾" groups when
I removed the pressure point at the front of the stock.
I changed out the synthetic stock on a particularly accurate 700SSDM in 30-06 I own.
The original as I got it was free floated, the new stock had the pressure
points intact.
This rifle did not change group size or shape, but the POI moved up 2" at 100 meters with the pressure point intact. I left it in, since groups size/shape did not change.
I guess the bottom line is, you will not know what is best until you try it.
I am reluctant to mess with a good shooting rifle. [don't fix what is not broken, lol]
But vertical groups, or groups that string at an angle, are often related to stock pressure at the front, either bottom or side, or both.
Be aware that wood stocks, as much as I love wood, can change over a winter, or even while on a hunting trip if the weather is inclement, so free floating makes sense under these conditions to avoid a change in the POI.
Regards, Eagleye.