Help - Glock 22 vs. Norinco NP58

My opinion:

1. Glock 17 (Best bang for buck IMO and better resale if you don't like it)
2. NP22/34 (Second best bang for buck)
3. NP58 (Cheaper way to get into .40 cal)
4. Glock 22

I'd never bash Norinco's (I have/had a few) or any brand/model for that matter. Whatever gets yourself more trigger time to train/have fun is best.

The Glock has (so far) been the most reliable and eats anything I give her, and they're fairly well priced.

I've never understood gun snobbery on these forums. The shooter takes the shot, not the firearm.
 
verisimilitude said:
My opinion:

1. Glock 17 (Best bang for buck IMO and better resale if you don't like it)
2. NP22/34 (Second best bang for buck)
3. NP58 (Cheaper way to get into .40 cal)
4. Glock 22
Click to expand...

agreed

verisimilitude said:
I've never understood gun snobbery on these forums. The shooter takes the shot, not the firearm.
Click to expand...

lol gotta love forums, everyone has an opinion, and you not allowed to not know it.
 
you could look at the m&p 9mm or .40 range kit, comes with 3 mags and both mag holder the pistol holster in the kit. good price too
 
verisimilitude said:
My opinion:

1. Glock 17 (Best bang for buck IMO and better resale if you don't like it)
2. NP22/34 (Second best bang for buck)
3. NP58 (Cheaper way to get into .40 cal)
4. Glock 22

I'd never bash Norinco's (I have/had a few) or any brand/model for that matter. Whatever gets yourself more trigger time to train/have fun is best.

The Glock has (so far) been the most reliable and eats anything I give her, and they're fairly well priced.

I've never understood gun snobbery on these forums. The shooter takes the shot, not the firearm.
Click to expand...

I've never understood stupidity on these forums either? Why are people so ignorant as to dismiss something over "looks" rather than function and value? Not saying you're calling me a snob, but I've been called one before. I disagree with the title. I don't think my choice and preference in pistols is snobbery. Its common sense, logic, and an understanding of what I want out of my firearms. Clearly some of those points and in some cases all of those points are missing. Selecting a firearm based on looks alone is snobbery.

TDC
 
If the choice is between the two I'd probably go for a glock.

HOWEVER! If you really like the actual sig's I'd take a serious look at the sig classic 22's. As I found out the hard way, the cost of the gun itself is relatively small compared to the cost of ammo, magazines, holster, range fees, etc, even when shooting 9mm.
 
Starscream said:
If the choice is between the two I'd probably go for a glock.

HOWEVER! If you really like the actual sig's I'd take a serious look at the sig classic 22's. As I found out the hard way, the cost of the gun itself is relatively small compared to the cost of ammo, magazines, holster, range fees, etc, even when shooting 9mm.
Click to expand...

This is why i am buying the .22LR conversion kit for my Glock. So when I have a bad week $$$ for the.40SW i can shoot .22LR.
 
It's really hard to be a snob when we're talking about Glocks - if TDC wanted to be a snob, he could say if it isn't an HK (Sig, Colt, Dan Wesson.....). But a Glock? - decidedly midrange in price. You can't be a mid price range snob.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom