Remington 700 VS Composite Barrel Rifle .308

JJ-65

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
38   0   0
Location
On the hunt
Found one NIB for a good price, Remington made them 1999/2000 only. Anyone here have one of these rifles ? If so, how accurate is it, and is the bore life exceeding expectations? Thanks.
 
Actually, US army trials found carbon wrapped barrel accuracy exceeded requirements well past 5 thousand rounds, whereas all steel barrels were finished by 3 thousand rounds. Only the ten to one cost ratio kept top army brass from adopting the the C/W barrel.
 
Actually, US army trials found carbon wrapped barrel accuracy exceeded requirements well past 5 thousand rounds, whereas all steel barrels were finished by 3 thousand rounds. Only the ten to one cost ratio kept top army brass from adopting the the C/W barrel.

I guess you answered your own question.
 
Depending on the thermal conductivity of the carbon fiber used, it could actually make for a barrel that gets hotter internally, similar to wrapping insulation around it. Which is usually not good for barrel life.
So was this analysis you mention based on proper bore scope analysis and comparison over many barrels of each kind? or " it just happened to shoot well longer ", which could stem from other factors.
To me there is nothing about it that would logically or magically make it reduce throat wear, it would be about equal to giving a car a coat of paint and expecting another 100,000miles out of the engine.

The 2 together might make for better harmonics that could improve accuracy. I would expect this is where much of it is, and some possible placebo effect.
I'd be quite interested to see how the steel and carbon fiber behave together over consecutive firing as the temp rises and stresses change, as I do love experimentation, but it needs real data.
 
Depending on the thermal conductivity of the carbon fiber used, it could actually make for a barrel that gets hotter internally, similar to wrapping insulation around it. Which is usually not good for barrel life.
So was this analysis you mention based on proper bore scope analysis and comparison over many barrels of each kind? or " it just happened to shoot well longer ", which could stem from other factors.
To me there is nothing about it that would logically or magically make it reduce throat wear, it would be about equal to giving a car a coat of paint and expecting another 100,000miles out of the engine.

The 2 together might make for better harmonics that could improve accuracy. I would expect this is where much of it is, and some possible placebo effect.
I'd be quite interested to see how the steel and carbon fiber behave together over consecutive firing as the temp rises and stresses change, as I do love experimentation, but it needs real data.

You sound pretty edumacated in them scienses!

I too would be very interested in some data. Heavy barrel accuracy in a light package would be something that could push me towards another build.
 
Actually, US army trials found carbon wrapped barrel accuracy exceeded requirements well past 5 thousand rounds, whereas all steel barrels were finished by 3 thousand rounds. Only the ten to one cost ratio kept top army brass from adopting the the C/W barrel.

Link to this?
 
Back
Top Bottom