There are at least three iterations of Pythom factory grips that I am personally experienced, there may be more. As with S&W grips, generally the earlier the better. - dan
John leave me in your will please lol, i want that 44 with the ivory grips.
Jesus john is there anything you dont own, and kill the moose already.
Jesus john is there anything you dont own, and kill the moose already.
People only compare the trigger.
but IMO, Not only the trigger, just pull the hammer and feel it.
The very first time I pulled the hammer on a Royal Blue Python, I understand why it cost twice of a 586.
As someone who has owned both Pythons and Performance Center Smith's, I can honestly say that the Python has a better DA trigger pull. It is the Cadillac of Revolvers and I wouldn't flinch at $2K plus for a really nice example... If Colt would start making the Python again I probably would pay over $3K for a new one...
Well any gun i own, i plan on shooting it a lot, i dont have safe queens. I have thought about buying a python, but would i diminish its value by shooting it lots? As well i have never held one, so not sure if it fits my hands. Other then for collector reasons, for 2000 bux i can buy a lot of other guns and ammo. So im wondering is it just a collector thing that makes people want these so much, im sure they shoot well, but for 2000 bux?
Same here. If I don't use it, it's gone. I did try collecting at one point in time, variations of the Colt New Service revolver. I got to four or fiveand decided that wasn't my game and got rid of them.
Nothing the matter with getting a classic like the Python and shooting it. That's what it's for. Get one, enjoy, shoot and take good care of it.
2000 bux? Same idea as getting from point A to point B. A toyota Corolla will work but it's a more fun ride in a Ferrari.
Well any gun i own, i plan on shooting it a lot, i dont have safe queens. I have thought about buying a python, but would i diminish its value by shooting it lots? As well i have never held one, so not sure if it fits my hands. Other then for collector reasons, for 2000 bux i can buy a lot of other guns and ammo. So im wondering is it just a collector thing that makes people want these so much, im sure they shoot well, but for 2000 bux?
It is a REAL nice shooter... I say buy it, shoot it and keep it in good condition... As long as you treat it well, there is no worry about depreciation for most Pythons.
Is it worth $2,000 as range toy? Easy answer: YES, yes it is...
Very foolishly, I sold the first one I had. This one, an early 1957 production model
is a keeper.
![]()
Shoots well also.
![]()
Johann, I was just looking at your pic, looks like the grips are off of a 357 (the model, not the caliber) as they have silver medallions. Colt supplied the Pythons with gold medallions originally. Same grip other then that though, and a nice looking piece. - dan
Could have easily been substituted at some point in the supply chain, or if Colt was short parts on any given day. I have one of those screwdrivers tucked away too, came with one of my Diamondbacks. There have been slight changes to the Pythons over the years, roll marks, the prancing pony stamp, sights. Some of the things that the hardcore collectors look at. I've owned and used Pythons with 2.5, 3, 4, 6, and 8 inch barrels, nickel, three different blued finishes, electro less nickel (Coltguard) and brushed, natural and polished stainless. In 38 Special (yes, only 38, not 38/357) and 357. Colt even catalogue a 22 version for a while, though one has never popped up to my knowledge. There have been a couple of test guns built in 41 mag. Came out of the plant in workers' lunch boxes and never catalogue by Colt themselves. Lots of Variations for a collector to play with. - dan
I 'wrote it off' as probably being a Diamondback but now



























