AR, TAR or Vector ...?

Pretty much spot on. It would have to fall to $1k for anyone to buy one if it was restricted.

Then why is there a market for $3k and $4k Ar's?

There will always be those that want fancy toys, and are willing to pay for them, even if they are restricted. For example, I have a restricted Swiss Arms.
 
Let's face it, if tavor was restricted, no one would buy one.

I would. A bullpup with excellent ergonomics. Fast almost AR fast mag changes, side charging handle, and extremely handy. You can accurately fire the Tavor with an 18.5" barrel with one hand. You can hold them on target with little to no fatigue. They have advantages. Plus I see it as the other rifle development to the AR rifles currently being used. Sort of the continuation of the AK principles running parallel to the AR lines. I consider it historically significant in small arms designs/use. Also I can't buy an AUG.

I bought my PS90 and it was restricted. No regrets. Although I have to say, I'm considering getting it non restricted eventually. Now if only the lame 5 round mag limit wasn't a factor. 50 is a much nicer number.
 
Both Tar and Kriss V are good ones simply they are non-restricted and we can shoot it anywhere in the wild. But Tar is not really a looker, and Kriss contains some new technology due to its bolt design, so I'm gonna get a Kriss.
 
I have a couple of AR's, I like them a lot. I have also ordered a Tavor, I have played with them and really enjoyed them as well. I have a KPOS kit for my Glocks, they are fun to shoot and I will probably get a Vector to add to the collection. Also going to need a few more gun safe's to house the new additions coming as well as a couple of Dillon XL1050 reloading presses. The joys of gun ownership have no bounds.
 
Back
Top Bottom