.223 vs 22-250

[JoelGreen]

Should probably be mentioned, if you intend on taking shots under 200 yards, look at a nice 22WM, rifles are cheap ammo is cheap and pelt damage is non existent. You wont shoot out a barrel and can spend more on accessories. I've got a HB Marlin and with Remington Premier puts 10 shots in a quarter at 100, total package with scope and bipod cost $400.

 

[mackillan]

Went with a Sako hunter stainless in 22-250 with a Swar 2.5-15 x 56 with BRH reticle. I like the speed demons.

 

[two-dogs]

Iam with you, on the 243 for sure.

ice cream cone treat for you in Brandon for sure, Gary!

 

[mackillan]

Velocity is king

 

[hakx]

Velocity is king

If you reload, most definitely the 22-250. The 204 is fast, and the 223 is plentiful, but the 22-250 rocks.

 

[hawk-i]

22-250 all the way!!!

 

[captonion]

Have both...Shoot the 223 more..Not sure why, I just do...

 

[CV32]

Have both...Shoot the 223 more..Not sure why, I just do...

Same here.

 

[upnadam]

Lifes too short, barrel life too short, the only thing thats not too short is the coyotes life after you shoot it with a 22-250.

 

[seamus30]

OK, I have another question. Are the .223, .204 Ruger, and .22-250 all considered pelt friendly? Does one stand out more than the others?

 

[seamus30]

Another question, What about the .17 HMR? Is it to small for coyotes?

 

[CV32]

Another question, What about the .17 HMR? Is it to small for coyotes?

I'd suggest either a search (recommended) or a separate thread. That question could get 'messy' in a hurry.

 

[Tikka6xc]

In range it's fine. If coyotes what u really want, .223 and 22-250 will never fail u

 

[upnadam]

I have a 204 and a 22-250. The 250 will put big holes in a pelt. Havent shot one with the ruger yet but guys say pin hole in entrance no exit.