Glocks are ugly?

Glocks aren't so much 'ugly' as 'boring' if you ask me, but then I love two-tone steel pistols which are apparently considered ostentatious by a lot of people. That said, I still love 'em.
 
Yes Glocks are ugly, but have you seen it with a threaded barrel and protector, with extended mag. ###Y.
almost like the glock machine pistol
 
Bad wording, not more functional. All handguns have the same function. I meant, Glocks usually have lower failure rate, less parts, simpler maintenance. Besides, they have been chosen as main sidearm by so many armies and police forces not because of their look, right? As I said, you can like them or dislike, that's personal preferences but be honest and admit that they are very reliable.
 
I repeat. I don't sleep with or have ###ual relations with my Glocks.

They are boringly reliable paper punchers - perhaps steel plate ringers at most.
 
Ugly though it may be, my Glock is the whore of the stable. Amazed it`s still going. Gets pounded week after week, month after month, year after year.
Replacing worn parts have cost under $200 over 30K which is more than acceptable in my book.

One always requires a workhorse and I`ll always own one....ugly or not.
 
TACTICAL111 said:
Ugly though it may be, my Glock is the whore of the stable. Amazed it`s still going. Gets pounded week after week, month after month, year after year.
Replacing worn parts have cost under $200 over 30K which is more than acceptable in my book.
Click to expand...

+1 on this one
 
The 3.5 RTF (Or whatever they call it) with fish fins like slide serrations on the slide are by far the uglyest GLOCK model in my book. I prefer the regular Gen3/gen4 look; Clean and functional look.

To each their own...
 
drache said:
Ever try pistol whipping someone with a polymer gun? It's like trying to beat someone with a wiffle ball bat....
Click to expand...

Really, please do tell us all about pistol whipping, how important it is, and it is important at the range?

For me "Pistol whipping" never was, and never will be something I'll take into consideration.

Don't like Glocks, then don't buy one. Everyone has thier own tastes.
 
id64 said:
You can have both :) and play Die Hard 2 = 92 vs Glock 7 porcelain gun made in Germany
D4R_8707_5159_1-small.jpg
Click to expand...

hey, cool grips on a ###y 92.
Function can be ###y too and a ###y glock has not yet crossed my eyes. That said, I would consider one strictly if I had to carry it every day.

Here is what a walnut job did to my 92FS. Not my pic but exactly what it looks like.

inox2.jpg
 
I personally like both looks - modern Glock and classic 92. They both designed well and show the character.
And if I ever going to live in place that allows to carry that will be Glock for sure, 19 most likely.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom