I understand why someone might want a revolver that can shoot 9mm. I did and I tried it. I also gave it up as a lost cause. I came to the conclusion that 9mm was made for auto guns and not revolvers. I now just shoot 38 special in my revolvers and 9mm in semi auto guns that way I have less stomach acid.
Are you SERIOUS? The S&W 547 is what I use to test 9mm ammo before I waste it in SIGs and Glocks and Walthers and such. If it doesn't all go in the same hole at 10 meters with any one of my 547s, it's going to group more than two inches in any one of the autos!
9mm is about the perfect revolver round. Some might argue that their 10mm/.40 S&W 610 or their .45 ACP 625 is better, and I will not burst that bubble. To each their own. But if you want to know what your 9mm, .40, or .45 ammunition is capable of, shoot it from a high quality revolver.
Also I hate cheap guns and really want nothing to do with them.
Graydog
Well, that part I agree with! The Charter Arms is quite cheaply made. I won't say I hate them, but the 9mm one I played with got noticeably better as I cycled it (catching and gently dropping the hammer) while talking to the salesman at CSC. The trigger also got black from the honing compound they left in the action so you could finish the pistol for them as you used it! The thing does look awfully cheap, feels cheap, though the extractor mechanism is every bit as cool as the S&W 547 version.
S&W K frame revolvers, for me, are some of the most accurate handguns there are, in any caliber. But I get better accuracy out of a 9mm K frame than I do out of the same gun in .38/.357, for about half the price. The only one that makes me grin more is my model 17.