I have already expressed my opinion to Goeff on this one, but a little examination on the subject is worthwhile.
Originally Remington issued their 244 rifles with a 1-12" twist.
These rifles would usually fail to stabilize "spitzer" or pointed, 100 grain bullets due to their length.
However, it was NOT etched in stone.
I owned two of these rifles over the years, and both would stabilize 100 grain spitzer flat base bullets just fine, as long as they were driven 3000+ fps.
I think that a 1-11" twist will stabilize most 100 grain and down 6mm bullets without a problem.
However,the problem would appear with a VLD 105-108 grain pill, I'm sure, since a 1-8 or possibly a 1-8½" twist is needed to stabilize these very long pills.
As AP observed [post #6], there are no absolutes in this game. I'll illustrate.
I had a HB rifle in a large 6.5mm chambering. The barrel was 30" long, 1-10" twist.
I wanted to build a 6.5-06, so had my 'smith screw off that HB, turn it down to sporter contour, and fit it to another action and chamber it in 6.5-06
It finished up at 26.5" long.
By all accounts, the 1-10" twist should only have stabilized rather "short" 6.5mm bullets [possibly up to the 129 grain Hornady FB.]
However, that barrel completely surprised me.
It shot all bullets I tried in it well, including VLD 140's and 142's.
I even shot those VLDs at a 1000 yard competition, and did quite well with it.
All the press said it couldn't work, but it did. Why? No way to explain this.
So it is always worth a try.
My personal feeling is a 1-11" twist will work with most "hunting" 6mm bullets at 6mm Remington velocities.
[The Berger 105 grain excepted. (Don't consider these a "hunting" bullet anyway, lol)]
Regards, Eagleye.