I've got a 700 MR and a Shilen 7mm tube sitting here destined to be a 7x57.
Strange but you couldn't give me a 7-08. I dislike the cartridge about as much as I dislike the 260 Rem.
I like the classic cartridges.
I own, shoot, love both 7mm-08 and .260 AI... funny huh?
The 7X57 gets its edge from 2-3 grs greater case capacity than the 7mm-08, which becomes greater when the throat allows OAL's as high as 3.150" (in a Standard Action) with 175 gr bullets. The 7mm-08 cannot typically be loaded to an OAL longer than 2.950", as it usually resides in a Short Action which has a mag length limit, but it's really its shorter cartridge length that prevents a longer OAL. Seating the 7X57 out further can add another 2 grs of powder capacity, such that I could load 55.0 grs of H4831SC under a 175 gr bullet at an OAL of 3.150" in my 7X57, whereas I have never heard of a 7mm-08 that can exceed 50.0. Now 55.0 grs of H4831SC is not my max load (53.0 is), but it illustrates the difference.
What fools so many people is that most factory loads and loads posted by powder manufacturers have the 7mm-08 loaded to 50K CUP, and the 7X57 to about 45K CUP. In all actions except the M96, i.e. M98 and commercial, they can be loaded to the same pressure.
All to say, there's really only about 50-75 fps difference between the two, but it's the 7X57 over the 7mm-08, not the other way around.
I was going to post, but Andy pretty much summed it up for me above.




















































