Ont. range without probation?

The three times a year policy for guests is to entice them to join the club.

If unlimited shooting were allowed all these people would have zero incentive to join & be "paying" members.

Same with my club. One of my buddies actually joined because he was really enjoying the club and was disappointed when I told him he had to wait until next year to come back as a guest.
 
to qualify for center fire you only need to be able to shoot 10/10 within the "1" ring or better at 20 meters.

Am I reading this right? You need to be able to put 10 shots out of 10 in a 1 inch ring from 20 metres away? If that's the case you must have a crapload of great shooters or no one is allowed to shoot centre fire. Or have I misunderstood?
 
Am I reading this right? You need to be able to put 10 shots out of 10 in a 1 inch ring from 20 metres away? If that's the case you must have a crapload of great shooters or no one is allowed to shoot centre fire. Or have I misunderstood?

Isn't the 1 ring, the outer ring?
 
Same with my club. One of my buddies actually joined because he was really enjoying the club and was disappointed when I told him he had to wait until next year to come back as a guest.

This is my issue with the 3 time rule ... For one the club in question has a 10 year waiting list to get in and a 5500 dollar start up cost... I'm okay with the rule if membership is easy to come by but this club it is not. Why not just charge 15 dollars a visit after 3 ... Then 20 after 10 then by the tenth visit they have paid almost the cost of a spouse membership?

To say it deters paying members couldn't be any more farse. Its not like they are pay as you go members or if they can get an att they are there under my supervison and as per the rules we can only really take 1 bench or lane and they most definitly don't have a key to the place..

Again ill state that I love the club and the guys there but some of this stuff just drives me crazy
 
This is my issue with the 3 time rule ... For one the club in question has a 10 year waiting list to get in and a 5500 dollar start up cost... I'm okay with the rule if membership is easy to come by but this club it is not. Why not just charge 15 dollars a visit after 3 ... Then 20 after 10 then by the tenth visit they have paid almost the cost of a spouse membership?

To say it deters paying members couldn't be any more farse. Its not like they are pay as you go members or if they can get an att they are there under my supervison and as per the rules we can only really take 1 bench or lane and they most definitly don't have a key to the place..

Again ill state that I love the club and the guys there but some of this stuff just drives me crazy

I am also a member of SGC & I believe part of the problem is that we are located within the GTA. Many ranges in this area have closed for various reasons & this has resulted in an added strain on existing facilities.

I do not feel our guest policy is a "farce" as you put it. Many people have paid a lot of $$$ to become members & these are the people that are the clubs main priority. Guests are welcome but three visits a year at $10.00 per visit is a very reasonable fee.If these restrictions were not in place there are many that would remain guests & simply pay the token fee, be it $10.00 or $25.00 with no intention of ever joining our club.


Advise your guests to get their names on the list of those wanting to purchase shares. I was talking with one of our directors today & there may be another issue of shares made available later this year. At this time this is only a maybe but as they say, if you you are not on the list you may miss an opportunity.
 
Agreed.
I understand extreme measures are unjust, but there must be a minimum crash course for ranges.
As an avid shooter, I feel very uneasy and unsafe if a new pistol shooter has no idea of the basic range rules, let alone a basic proof of ability.
I don't like to be sweeped, and have been on countless outings (by members and guests)

There is a need and requirement for a BASIC course where new members are given the proper instruction in pistol safety on any range, PERIOD.

Having said that, I reiterate: BASIC pistol safety.

An important caveat: A club should be able to prove and document due dilligence on their part.
I understand frustration on the part of the new pistol shooter. I was there myself at one point, and given, undo probationary periods and red tape are unnecessary, BUT, basic safety/range courses ARE necessary.

To what extent is up to the individual range.

I stand by that firmly.

No, a club should not. You received a firearms license, governed by the Federal government, stating that you understand firearms safety.
 
Hey, I am not saying probation is a bad thing.....The problem I have with the probation is simply a person who has never handled a gun, shot in organized events or hunted is treated the same as a person who has.

I will go out of my way to support a club that wants me!

--------The reason we have probation--------
I was at a "box store" gun counter. A guy about 25-30 approached the counter and wanted to see a gun, a PAL was requested and displayed. The rest went like this.....
clerk: What gun are you interested in?
Guy: Maybe that or that one. (pointing at the rack)
clerk: what are you going to do with it?
Guy: I want to shoot long distance.
Clerk: How far?
Guy: About that far. (points at a canoe on the wall 40 yards away)
clerk: All these gun will shoot that far.
Guy: No way really? all of them?

I had to walk away.......he REQUIRES PROBATION/SUPERVISION

Education i guess is the better term but how did he get a PAL without the basic info all guns are dangerous past 40 yards?

Add in a practical to the existing PAL course.
 
Am I reading this right? You need to be able to put 10 shots out of 10 in a 1 inch ring from 20 metres away? If that's the case you must have a crapload of great shooters or no one is allowed to shoot centre fire. Or have I misunderstood?

Or lots of bad shooters, the 1 ring is the largest one (outmost ring), basically they want you to be able to hit paper at 20 yards.
 
I am also a member of SGC & I believe part of the problem is that we are located within the GTA. Many ranges in this area have closed for various reasons & this has resulted in an added strain on existing facilities.

I do not feel our guest policy is a "farce" as you put it. Many people have paid a lot of $$$ to become members & these are the people that are the clubs main priority. Guests are welcome but three visits a year at $10.00 per visit is a very reasonable fee.If these restrictions were not in place there are many that would remain guests & simply pay the token fee, be it $10.00 or $25.00 with no intention of ever joining our club.


Advise your guests to get their names on the list of those wanting to purchase shares. I was talking with one of our directors today & there may be another issue of shares made available later this year. At this time this is only a maybe but as they say, if you you are not on the list you may miss an opportunity.

Again saying that there would be no benefit to becoming a member is false.. A guest is just that. He can only shoot under my supervision. They cannot get an ATT, he does not get a key or a vote.. So basically the 3 time rule is a solution to a non existing problem. I can't see a single negative to getting rid of the rule..

Remember if that person is my wife or kid it only costs them 100(ish) a year and they can shoot alone.. So if someone guests more than 10 times (without changing the rate) they have the paid the same as a secondary member without the club having to do anything with the people besides take thier money and smile.

As for additional shares I've spoke to some of the BOD and they have told me that the only way of creating new shares would be splitting the existing ones.. And I would bet 80% or more of the members will not sell the second share if that happens..

All in all if the only complaint you have about a range is some moderate ATT difficulties and the guest policy your doing alright
 
Agree with this one. We tried to go via backdoor. A club accepts guests, but not open to new members. The application was sent to the club and eventually declined. A club membership is definitely required. Unless the application is handled by an open-minded staff (to which I was told happens once in a while), you might be able to get a STATT with multiple days specified.


Nope. The Ontario CFO will not issue a STATT to attend a range in that case. I tried before I was a member of my current club and was refused. They also won't process LTATT applications sent directly to them from individuals, only clubs.
 
I know a club where you get one course, 3 times shooting with the guy that gives the course or someone that sponsor you can sign your card. Then you are a member in good standing and get your att.
 
[/QUOTE] There's nothing stopping you from applying for short term ATTs or a long term ATT through the CFO yourself.
I hate to see clubs impose further restrictions on shooters than they already have to deal with from the CFO and some LEO as it is.[/QUOTE]

Sorry! In ON the CLUB has to apply for the LTATT. I don't know why clubs have such exclusive rules, unless they already have all the members they want. The CFO mandates that the clubs have a handgun safety course of at least 8 hours duration that new members take before the club applies for the ATT. This skould include a practical portion shooting with live rounds in my opinion. Remember, the RPAL course/ test doesn't include any actual shooting. Some clubs will insist on the whole enchilada including a probationary period shooting borrowed handguns even if the member has proven experience at another club. If a club has had bad experiences with new shooters they will be extra cautious because it only takes one incident to shut them down. Best bet is to keep after the club you want to belong to rather than try to take the course elsewhere, unless you know in advance your home club will accept that.
 
It just doesn't make sense to allow us in Ontario to get an ATT to bring the restricted gun home and while we are on probation not allow us to take and shoot our own guns. I think its fair that we have to shoot with an RO and thats fine with me. I don't like having to "borrow" guns each time and risk a problem or damage to a loaner gun and having to pay for it. I picked my guns because I like them and know a lot about them and would feel safest shooting them. Then I agree that we should get a sign off on revolver, shot gun, rifle and handgun but let us also use our own while under probation. Even have it expire after the 6 months if we don't do enough shooting or pass and that would be incentive to attend more often and pass the probationary shoots.
 
Back
Top Bottom