FN Lands Army M4 Contract. Underbids. COlt, Remington.

oneguy

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
Location
Ontario
ht tp://www.guns.com/2013/02/26/fn-lands-army-m4-contract-underbids-colt-remington/


After a lengthy back-and-forth bidding war between Colt and Remington, one that would eventually involve the Government Accountability Office and the threat of a Congressional hearing, F.N. Herstal has won the contract to update and replace the Army’s aging rifles.

In April of 2012, Remington finally broke the chain of Colt contracts with the U.S. Army, placing an $84 million bid for a run of 120,000 M4A1s, with 24,000 carbines to be delivered starting September of this year.

The cost per Remington M4A1 was just $673 per. Their bid severely undercut Colt’s previous contract, which priced the rifles at over $1,200 a piece.

FN’s contract with the Army is $77 million for the first 120,000 rifles, which works out to a bottom line of just under $642 per M4A1. These will be manufactured at FNH USA in South Carolina along side the M16A4s and M249s FNH USA currently produces for the U.S. armed forces.

After Remington won the first bid, Colt immediately filed a complaint with the GAO stating that the company did not properly calculate the royalties as part of their bid, and the GAO found in Colt’s favor, at least partially.

“GAO reviewed the challenges raised by Colt and found that the agency failed to follow the solicitation criteria with regard to the evaluation of the offers’ total evaluated prices and sustained the protest on this basis. Colt’s other challenges were denied,” said Ralph O. White, council for the GAO.

While they agreed that they did not correctly figure for the royalties any M4 supplier owes Colt for Army contracts, the GAO rejected the claims that Remington did not have the manufacturing capabilities to supply the military with firearms in this quantity.

Following the decision, the GAO told the Army that they had 65 days to solicit new bids from vendors or face Congress if they went ahead and signed the Remington contract. Not willing to face the legislature over a budgetary decision, the Army complied.

Although the list of bidders was confidential, it was obviously going to be between Colt, Remington and F.N. Herstal.

This is bad news for Colt and Remington — Colt will have to look toward new business avenues and Remington will not be expanding as they had previously planned — but it is good news for FNH and of course, the Army. Not only will they be spending less (although they have $180 million earmarked for rifles; it is an Infinite Delivery, Infinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for the improved M4s) they’ll be getting new rifles in time to replace their rapidly-declining supply of carbines.

Landing a new vendor is just part of the Army’s larger Product Improvement Program (PIP), in fact, it’s phase one, where the Army implements a “field conversion” from M4 to M4A1 carbines. These rifles have heavier barrels that are a little more accurate, especially with heavy use due to their improved thermal properties. They also drop the 3-round burst ratcheting fire control group, which delivers inconsistent trigger pulls depending on whether or not the disconnector is engaged with a stop notch. It also comes with an H2 buffer for a softer- and slower-cycling action. The M4A1 is more consistent, accurate and reliable.

Phase two of the Army’s PIP calls for a new railed handguard and any accessories that soldiers need as they are implemented.

Technically, the Army is still running the Individual Carbine program as well, which will determine what comes after the M4A1. Colt and Remington will have plenty of future chances to bite at the Army apple.
Categories: Military, Product & Industry News

28 467
 
Hmm.. makes you wonder how much Colt was making off those M4s when commercial LE6920s were selling for $1050 at the same time. I guess Colt's going to have to start supplying the civilian sector a little more steadily if they want to keep the doors open and lights on.
 
how can FN undercut remington's price by almost half? something dosn't seem right with these numbers.

Remember the $600 hammer of the 80s? .... Someone is not including a kickback, or maybe, with everyone watching their backs, there is no more kickback. Old boys club is breaking up.
 
If colt had a brain they could pump out those initial 24000 AR15s (instead of m4a1s) into the civilian market right now and probably sell them all in a month. And maybe Colt canada could start selling to civilians as well ;)
 
Remember the $600 hammer of the 80s? ....

This is so true. I bought a number of NASA items a few years back as part of a government lot showcasing items from the late 70's and early/mid 80's -- many with with ridiculous pricetags (ie. $28,000 for a VHS player). The tags were still attached on many of the (unused) items, and I laugh everytime Judd Hirsch talks about government spending in Independance Day.
 
I don't see the problem here in the immediate time frame. The losing bidders could, right now, pump out as many ar15's as would have been needed by the military to sell in the civi market. For triple the markup.
FN will still need to concentrate on the military contract at the lower profit margin.

After things cool down things will probably flip tho.
 
I think by law they have to go with the low bidder on identical items produced by different companies.

I'd like to know how Colt gets royalties on M4 carbines. Hasn't the patent for the AR direct impingement design expired a looooooong time ago?
 
I'd like to know how Colt gets royalties on M4 carbines. Hasn't the patent for the AR direct impingement design expired a looooooong time ago?

The Technical Data Package (TDP) that contains the exact blueprints and specifications for the carbine as well as the processes that go into manufacturing it and testing it is still property of Colt, and hence if you want them to let you see and use it you need to pay a license fee. Patents would have only covered certain specific subsystems in the carbine that were either new and novel or significant improvements to an existing design. Part of Colt's agreement with the Army et al is that they get royalties for providing this data to the manufacturer and the Army can't really get around it without going to an entirely new rifle platform.
 
Back
Top Bottom