They haven't started shipping yet, not even in the US.
Leave to me to be too far ahead of the crowd.![]()
Very specific. Need a inch tube objective, or less, with 4x minimum, with a plain reticule, that can be used 90° to usual axis so that turrets will not be in the path of the top brass ejection from the straight pull rifle action. Limited space up front due to iron sights right under where objective would be. Drop compensation reticule would be a pain in the butt. Tried it with a Nikon 3X, bell too large , scope too short for eye relief in that mounting and it has range grads on reticule which are very distracting at 90° to the vertical axis.
Thanks for the heads up. It looks like a great entry-level AR scope, but I might go with a different product if it's not hitting our market by this summer. It's showing as $220 in the US, which would bring it in the Millett price range on our side of the border.
Higginson lists it for $280.
Very specific. Need a inch tube objective, or less, with 4x minimum, with a plain reticule, that can be used 90° to usual axis so that turrets will not be in the path of the top brass ejection from the straight pull rifle action. Limited space up front due to iron sights right under where objective would be. Drop compensation reticule would be a pain in the butt. Tried it with a Nikon 3X, bell too large , scope too short for eye relief in that mounting and it has range grads on reticule which are very distracting at 90° to the vertical axis.



























