Ok guys. First thing is that I am not a flintlock guy - past repairing locks I've never really had much to do with them. Never dealt with breach plugs, never built a flintlock, so these questions might be a bit on the stupid side.
This is the current situation:
Build involves a no-name .65 cal smoothbore barrel and no-name lock. Breech plug has been fitted to the point that the shoulder of the plug bottoms out against the back of the barrel and the face of the plug bottoms out against the rear of the chamber - dye on all points is rubbed off completely on all mating surfaces, so I think I've got a pretty good fit for the breech plug.
Have a couple problems.
1) The gun I have has a .50 inch threaded breech plug. I feel like this is a bit short, but I've never really inspected many breech plugs. Is this a problem?
2) I haven't drilled a vent hole yet. This is because the lock I have is not long enough for the pan to pass the front face of the breech plug without the mainspring and other parts of the lock sitting snugly against the back of the barrel.
I have two options:
A) Build a bigger lock, which probably isn't a huge deal but will delay my project by a month or more if I can get tools together before work goes crazy again.
B) Drill the vent through the barrel wall into the breech plug and then recess the plug to meet the vent. This is easier, but I'm concerned about exposing the threading directly to the vent hole and subsequent corrosion of the threads as well as the chance that if the plug advances slightly over the years the vent hole between the barrel and the plug will no longer align. Since the breech plug is a traditional style with only a short shoulder at the top forming the tang there isn't the option of drilling the touch hole into the breech plug behind the barrel in cap lock style.
SO - Am I being paranoid about drilling through the barrel wall and into the breech plug, thus exposing the threading to corrosion, or is this done now and again?
(And to avoid derailment - The barrel will be thoroughly proofed regardless of how things are done. I also would prefer to use these components, since they're what I have and don't want to spend much money on what is essentially a time spending project)
This is the current situation:
Build involves a no-name .65 cal smoothbore barrel and no-name lock. Breech plug has been fitted to the point that the shoulder of the plug bottoms out against the back of the barrel and the face of the plug bottoms out against the rear of the chamber - dye on all points is rubbed off completely on all mating surfaces, so I think I've got a pretty good fit for the breech plug.
Have a couple problems.
1) The gun I have has a .50 inch threaded breech plug. I feel like this is a bit short, but I've never really inspected many breech plugs. Is this a problem?
2) I haven't drilled a vent hole yet. This is because the lock I have is not long enough for the pan to pass the front face of the breech plug without the mainspring and other parts of the lock sitting snugly against the back of the barrel.
I have two options:
A) Build a bigger lock, which probably isn't a huge deal but will delay my project by a month or more if I can get tools together before work goes crazy again.
B) Drill the vent through the barrel wall into the breech plug and then recess the plug to meet the vent. This is easier, but I'm concerned about exposing the threading directly to the vent hole and subsequent corrosion of the threads as well as the chance that if the plug advances slightly over the years the vent hole between the barrel and the plug will no longer align. Since the breech plug is a traditional style with only a short shoulder at the top forming the tang there isn't the option of drilling the touch hole into the breech plug behind the barrel in cap lock style.
SO - Am I being paranoid about drilling through the barrel wall and into the breech plug, thus exposing the threading to corrosion, or is this done now and again?
(And to avoid derailment - The barrel will be thoroughly proofed regardless of how things are done. I also would prefer to use these components, since they're what I have and don't want to spend much money on what is essentially a time spending project)


















































