Try Will Bilozir at bilozir.net.
He stocks Fiocchi plastic casings in 24 and 32 both, as well as regular sizes. Casings come in bags of 100.
He is in Alberta, hits a lot of the gun shows.
Come to think of it, gotta get another couple bags myself!
I looked at that site after reading this. I didnt see a big selection of round lead ball ammo.
From what I understand, a snider may take ( for best accuracy) .585 , .590 , .595 , .600 ball size depending on the gun.
Whats the best place to start? in the middle?
I looked at that site after reading this. I didnt see a big selection of round lead ball ammo.
From what I understand, a snider may take ( for best accuracy) .585 , .590 , .595 , .600 ball size depending on the gun.
Whats the best place to start? in the middle?
The PROBLEM was that the Snider is a BREECH-LOADING rifle and they were trying to solve the accuracy problems with MUZZLELOADING solutions.
It didn't work.
That's why nine Marks of Service ammunition in just over half that number of years..... and yet the 1858 Enfield was famed as an ACCURATE rifle.
So what happened?
Easy: it became a breechloader.
WE are at a remove of a century and a half from the problem, but we DO understand more about Breechloaders today. To get best accuracy from a Breechloader, you must know the bore and groove diameters. Then you use an OVERSIZED bullet, something very close to Groove Diameter.
The Barrels on these rifles were held as close as possible to a Bore Diameter of .577" and a Groove Diameter of .584". If they are not perfect by OUR standards, just remember that they were also in the middle of INVENTING precision measurement. The Master at Enfield was none other than Sir Joseph Whitworth, the man who almost single-handedly invented the whole science of precision measurement which we take for granted these days. Britain was the ONLY Army in the world which measured its rifle bores in THOUSANDTHS. America was using TWO decimal places and Russia still was using TENTHS of inches. So let's give the Old Boys a bit of slack. Actually, they were pretty close, most of the time.
So you go to the Groove diameter and make up a bullet to fit. Measure your bore and make your mould. You can start with a pair of surface-matched Aluminum blocks, put in your alignment pins and drill to 9/16 inch, which is .5625", then finish with a boring bar in the lathe, using your 4-jaw chuck. Your finished bullet will be about .584" but you can make it a few thou undersized and raise it to diameter by rolling the slugs between a pair of Axe files; you then lubricate with something like that Lee Liquid Alox.
Hope this helps.
You can start with a pair of surface-matched Aluminum blocks, put in your alignment pins and drill to 9/16 inch, which is .5625", then finish with a boring bar in the lathe, using your 4-jaw chuck. Your finished bullet will be about .584" but you can make it a few thou undersized and raise it to diameter by rolling the slugs between a pair of Axe files; you then lubricate with something like that Lee Liquid Alox.
I use a steel, hollow base mini mold ( can't remember the brand offhand, Lyman?) and a lard/ beeswax lube like Mooncoon stated above. I paper patch the bullets to proper size,lube the grooves and fill the base flush with the lube and my two band shoots accurate as heck. Tried everything to get my Sniders to shoot good and that was the only thing I found worked perfectly all the time so far.
The rifled musket barrels were intended to use a hollow based bullet.
Why would a bullet that shoots well in a muzzleloading barrel not shoot well in a breechloading barrel?
Bullet length and rifling twist are the same in both cases.
because when loaded from the muzzle the skirt is supposed to expand to fill the rifling when loading from the breech bullets are supposed to be over size to fill the rifling. the 1 in 78 like short bullets and the 1 in 48 can take bullets that are longer. of course we are talking about guns that where meant to be volley fired accuracy was not the most important thing but now we want accuracy best to use a bullet that's over sized .590"-.600" in a softer alloy seems to work best
because when loaded from the muzzle the skirt is supposed to expand to fill the rifling when loading from the breech bullets are supposed to be over size to fill the rifling. the 1 in 78 like short bullets and the 1 in 48 can take bullets that are longer. of course we are talking about guns that where meant to be volley fired accuracy was not the most important thing but now we want accuracy best to use a bullet that's over sized .590"-.600" in a softer alloy seems to work best
Loaded from the muzzle, the skirt will expand when fired.
Same bullet breech loaded, the skirt will expand when fired.
That was the whole point of the hollow based bullet.
Please explain how a bullet designed for a 1:78 muzzleloading barrel is too long for a 1:78 breechloading barrel.
Do some research. The Enfield rifled muskets were designed for accurate, aimed fire. They may have been fired in volleys under certain circumstances, but that doesn't mean that they weren't developed and tested for accuracy.



























