It's all good kids.
Ardent, I don't remember meeting but your prescence on the site has been a long one. I have respected and agreed with a great many of your comments/posts over the years.
My problem is this... And I believe sharing this perspective will explain my position and attitude.
I get inundated, nearly everyday with pm's and emails from canadian M14 type rifle owners. Half the time I am waaaayyy to busy to possibly answwer them all and many get ignored sadly.
When the handful of guys start up with the anti norc stuff and someone's mishap is blown way out of proportion(not saying they all are) , my inbox simply becomes something I dread opening. Drives me farking nutz. Not sure if the same thing happens to Hungry.... If it does, he handles it better than I obviously.
I get labelled as a guy who thinks norcs are the best to buy and that I despise springfield and so on.
This also is far from the truth. I am a fan of the platform in general but the main battle rifle forum has been built on the norinco M14s/m305. The community Hungry started, was based on.... The norinco M14s/M305 , so in short, this community of m14 nutz on CGN is/was made possible by the M14s/m305.
Lastly, we should all feel free to post our opinions, but with that comes a responsibilty to know when enough is enough.
So with that, I'll endeavor to care a little less when I see folks panicking because of a few issues with these rifles. I'll also try and ignore those that feel it is their duty to warn the masses away from buying and shooting chinese rifles.
I had a chuckle and point of levity reading this, as I recognise the PM part, I receive those same PMs and all that differs I'm sure between us is the opinions we return to the enquiries. What's more, I receive an awful lot of questions related to my site on guns / hunting / Africa etc by email, and PM of course, and indeed it can feel like work. Perhaps the rest of this is better shared by PM, but I'll share it here as it started here.
Where I feel things changed is insults were thrown, you'd called me a liar and exaggerator in thinly veiled terms, when I am neither of the sort. Even in just this thread
another barrel blow up I hadn't heard about was mentioned by a user. You just don't need to exaggerate to make the arguments I'm supporting, and knowing two fellows with guns that blew up in their hands (one of whom you can talk to yourselves on here) and talking about those two incidents is fact relation, and in no way exaggeration. Another, a third fellow with whom I've just made acquaintence and can't yet claim to know yet, is sending me a blown up M14 barreled action to test on (bolt failure). These are facts, being called an exaggerator or liar, take your pick of terms, when the stuff and incidents that get me "frothing at the mouth" are right here for all to see angered me severely. If you're the type that needs pictures those can be provided I'm sure with little difficulty.
I also must admit I've been tempted to call you an exaggerator, due to some quite unreal Springfield dangers / experiences you've detailed in quantity in the past. I didn't, because I would like to think I give the benefit of the doubt, just because I've never seen it and it seems fishy to me doesn't mean it isn't true. I have also been tempted to question your machining, deeply involved gunsmithing (apart from assembling), and metallurgy experience, especially in light of your barb towards me about "You build an LRB and..." Again, I chose to hold my tongue, as I just don't know and will give the benefit of the doubt. I'll trust you even, to be more direct. After I cooled down I took it as a desperate, and now perhaps I see it as frustrated rather than desperate given the PM questions explained, act to get me "off your back". I found it a tack I hadn't expected as mentioned having met you in person, your demeanour was not that of an "as$hole" as you describe yourself here. I found you quiet, inviting, and respectful.
Whether we like it or not, there is no question Norcs are failing quite frequently. Plenty (most by good measure) run great, and everyone gets to decide whether the failure risk is mitigated by the value they can provide. I've been fortunate in work and the choice is easy for me on bang for your buck vs guaranteed quality at a far higher cost, I recognise others will have different priorities when considering. I won't call them idiots, exaggerators, or liars, as they don't deserve that, and I will continue to share my opinion from what I have seen of Norcs and the frustrations I faced in building on them compared to M1A and LRB receivers. Those opinions are rarely popular here, as you note, because of the user base which is built on Norincos. I have no issue with debate, disagreement, and enjoy discussion. I take great issue with character insults and belittling due to disagreement.