NEA Polymer Backup Sights

Jarvy

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
123   0   0
Location
Mississauga, ON
I've been looking for some backup sights for my carbine for a while now. I love my NEA-15 and the price was right for the NEA polymer sights so I thought I'd give them a shot. I got them in the mail yesterday.

They're pretty rad.

d0qb.jpg

Cameraphone ahoy

I'm sure everyone's first thoughts were that they're a copy of the MAGPUL MBUS. They're polymer in a variety of the typical colours, spring-loaded and have a fairly similar look about them. You slide the sights onto the picatinny rail, then use a crossbolt with an allen key head to secure it in place. That is where the similarities end.

f6do.jpg

Hugging the rail

The sights are compact. When folded, they're shorter in length and lower in profile than the MBUS. The folded sights hunker right down and hug the rail. The sights flip up with a button located on the right hand side of the sights. While this slightly less intuitive than the MBUS's large top button, it allows the NEA sights to have a sharply sloped fore end, preventing anything from getting snagged on them. Another way they differ is that they do not "lock" in the upright position, but are held upright by spring tension alone. This also appears to be a bulk-reducing trade-off, though I don't anticipate it to cause any real problems.

Both front and rear sight can be ambidextrously adjusted without tools. Front sight elevation is adjusted via a knob under the post. Very cool, and a wonder why it's not a standard feature on all back-up sights at this point. The rear sight windage is adjusted via knobs on either side of the assembly. On both sights, each position is punctuated by a very distinct tactile click.

The rear sight has both large and small apertures, shaped in the traditional "L." This is both a pro and a con. The MAGPUL sights use a small aperture that rotates up into the larger aperture. While this saves space, a common problem is that the small aperture gets dislodged during firing, but does not drop fully out of the way. The result is that the sight picture is blocked. With the traditional L shape, this is not a problem. However, with the small aperture in the upright position, the large aperture sticks out to the rear, and the sight cannot be folded. I see this as a good trade, but your mileage may vary.

Here's where we get into where these sights really shine. The sight picture is fantastic.

sq9w.jpg

You don't suck and we don't hate you.

Once again, unlike the squared-off MBUS, the bottom of the front sight base is rounded. This gives a very wide HK-like field of view, and makes sight alignment a breeze. To top it off, on the top of the rear sight aperture, there is a notch. This is a close quarters battle sight for extreme close range, a neat feature to have.

So far they seem like great sights for the money. The real test will be when I go to the range after the long weekend. Has anyone tried them out yet?
 
They have to be much better then mbus for that price considering the magpul set costs the same

Why do the have to be "much better" when they cost the same. Why does NEA have to be held to a higher standard than Magpul?

If they are comparable to Magpul quality and are the same price, I see no problem with that. If they are ####, that's a little different.

I have not held a pair in my hands yet so I can't comment on quality, but for the life of me I can't figure out why their sight-posts are colour matched to the sight bodies on the FDE and OD models... It's not that big of a deal because I don't plan on taking my restricted AR to shoot at foliage or sand coloured targets, but...
 
With Magpul, you know what you are getting. NEA's track record has been spotty to say the least. Buy Canadian doesn't cut it unless the quality is there. I know I have been burned by the NEA stuff, so for me personally, I would always go with Magpul even at double the price. NEA has had serious quality issues over their entire range of products, so NEA will have to earn my business, and that will take a while, if it ever happens at all.
 
They have to be much better then mbus for that price considering the magpul set costs the same

They cost a little less than the MBUS, and MAGPUL stuff doesn't exactly have a flawless track record in my experience. I found the front sight claustrophobic, the rear sight aperture to be ragged and as noted above, I've found with multiple sight sets that the MBUS has a pretty major design flaw. Maybe they've fixed it, maybe I got bum sights and my friends had gotten bum sights by fluke, but I don't trust the MBUS.

Do I trust these? I don't know. But they definitely won't have the same problems. Will they have other problems? I'll find out.
 
Someone will pay 94 from a questionable source.
But scoff at paying 40 for an ebay MBUS set.

The ones I have are flawless. Ebay MBUS anyday over unknown product for a less than grwat canadian company
 
I don't understand why the aperature and posts match the sight colour instead of being black. Did they even test these?

How much tension is there on that front sight adjustment? Interesting design if it's tight enough to not get moved easily.
 
There`s quite a bit, and you have to turn the knob a 1/4 rotation before it snaps into `the new position. I don`t foresee it being jarred loose, but I`ll put markings on the knobs when I go to the range to see if there`s any movement. And the sight post colours is one of the reasons why I snagged a black one.

How much tension is there on that front sight adjustment? Interesting design if it's tight enough to not get moved easily.
 
So $95 + shipping for NEA ones. Or $76 + shipping for Magpul ones.

It's been mentioned NEA has a questionable record, and to pay more then the magpul mbus from brownells makes me wonder how successful this endeavour will be for them.....
 
I'd just like to know from the non shill accounts if the whole item is painted of if the app and the bolt is plastic.
The green and tan units the whole thing looks the same??
Is it china mart or made in canada??
 
I'd just like to know from the non shill accounts if the whole item is painted of if the app and the bolt is plastic.
The green and tan units the whole thing looks the same??

Painted? Or coloured? Both the rear aperture and the front post are the same polymer as the body, though the adjustment screws and hinge bolts are metal.
 
I'll think I'll pass for now. NEA hasn't exactly blown my socks off lately. In the VZ arena, I liked their stuff. Maybe we're just spoiled in terms of options and alternatives, but I'l stick with Magpul for polymer parts and accessories.
 
Painted? Or coloured? Both the rear aperture and the front post are the same polymer as the body, though the adjustment screws and hinge bolts are metal.

so the aperture and the front site are plastic?? ok now I understand what they are the same colour.
I just figgered they were metal and painted
does anyone have close up pics of the sights?
 
Thanks for the great review Jarvy. I just added more of the black ones to the website. I'm also going to start offering them as fronts and back as well...a few people have been asking for them this way.



I've been looking for some backup sights for my carbine for a while now. I love my NEA-15 and the price was right for the NEA polymer sights so I thought I'd give them a shot. I got them in the mail yesterday.

They're pretty rad.

d0qb.jpg

Cameraphone ahoy

I'm sure everyone's first thoughts were that they're a copy of the MAGPUL MBUS. They're polymer in a variety of the typical colours, spring-loaded and have a fairly similar look about them. You slide the sights onto the picatinny rail, then use a crossbolt with an allen key head to secure it in place. That is where the similarities end.

f6do.jpg

Hugging the rail

The sights are compact. When folded, they're shorter in length and lower in profile than the MBUS. The folded sights hunker right down and hug the rail. The sights flip up with a button located on the right hand side of the sights. While this slightly less intuitive than the MBUS's large top button, it allows the NEA sights to have a sharply sloped fore end, preventing anything from getting snagged on them. Another way they differ is that they do not "lock" in the upright position, but are held upright by spring tension alone. This also appears to be a bulk-reducing trade-off, though I don't anticipate it to cause any real problems.

Both front and rear sight can be ambidextrously adjusted without tools. Front sight elevation is adjusted via a knob under the post. Very cool, and a wonder why it's not a standard feature on all back-up sights at this point. The rear sight windage is adjusted via knobs on either side of the assembly. On both sights, each position is punctuated by a very distinct tactile click.

The rear sight has both large and small apertures, shaped in the traditional "L." This is both a pro and a con. The MAGPUL sights use a small aperture that rotates up into the larger aperture. While this saves space, a common problem is that the small aperture gets dislodged during firing, but does not drop fully out of the way. The result is that the sight picture is blocked. With the traditional L shape, this is not a problem. However, with the small aperture in the upright position, the large aperture sticks out to the rear, and the sight cannot be folded. I see this as a good trade, but your mileage may vary.

Here's where we get into where these sights really shine. The sight picture is fantastic.

sq9w.jpg

You don't suck and we don't hate you.

Once again, unlike the squared-off MBUS, the bottom of the front sight base is rounded. This gives a very wide HK-like field of view, and makes sight alignment a breeze. To top it off, on the top of the rear sight aperture, there is a notch. This is a close quarters battle sight for extreme close range, a neat feature to have.

So far they seem like great sights for the money. The real test will be when I go to the range after the long weekend. Has anyone tried them out yet?
 
Back
Top Bottom