So I was curious, and did some measurements.
Happens that 1 piece of H414 ball powder is approximately 0.00052cm^3. It has a radius of about 0.5 mm.
I was curious how many pieces of powder were in a 46.9 gr charge, which is the published charge for a 3.1 cm^3 dipper.
Turns out it's about 5920 pieces, based on the calculated average volume / piece, and using a 3.1 cm^3 dipper.
This means that 1 gr is approx 120 pieces. I looked carefully at what 120 pieces looked like, and concluded that indeed this amount could be added \ subtracted from 46.9 grains without a noticeable difference in perceived volume. For fun I compressed the powder charge in the dipper, and indeed there was approx enough space for that 120 pieces. Therefore the dipper technique could easily produce a charge variance of -+ 1 gr. Just the variance in void in the dipper could produce this error. The conclusion is that the dipper is not acceptable for producing a consistent charge.
I will therefore be buying the rcbs 505 balance beam asap. It's accurate to .1 gr, which is approx 12 pieces of powder. This amount would produce a downrange vertical spread of approx. .6 inches @ 450 yards, vs. the 6 inches with 120 piece variance. Therefore any significant vertical spread will be the result of other factors such as shooter, rifle, etc. Therefore I would expect my vertical moa to be comparable to my typical horizontal moa, assuming no \ light wind: 0.5 moa.
Happens that 1 piece of H414 ball powder is approximately 0.00052cm^3. It has a radius of about 0.5 mm.
I was curious how many pieces of powder were in a 46.9 gr charge, which is the published charge for a 3.1 cm^3 dipper.
Turns out it's about 5920 pieces, based on the calculated average volume / piece, and using a 3.1 cm^3 dipper.
This means that 1 gr is approx 120 pieces. I looked carefully at what 120 pieces looked like, and concluded that indeed this amount could be added \ subtracted from 46.9 grains without a noticeable difference in perceived volume. For fun I compressed the powder charge in the dipper, and indeed there was approx enough space for that 120 pieces. Therefore the dipper technique could easily produce a charge variance of -+ 1 gr. Just the variance in void in the dipper could produce this error. The conclusion is that the dipper is not acceptable for producing a consistent charge.
I will therefore be buying the rcbs 505 balance beam asap. It's accurate to .1 gr, which is approx 12 pieces of powder. This amount would produce a downrange vertical spread of approx. .6 inches @ 450 yards, vs. the 6 inches with 120 piece variance. Therefore any significant vertical spread will be the result of other factors such as shooter, rifle, etc. Therefore I would expect my vertical moa to be comparable to my typical horizontal moa, assuming no \ light wind: 0.5 moa.