A Very Rare and Exceptional Beauty: non-refurbished, clearly unfired 1953 Izhevsk SKS

Im gonna have to pull out my sks's to compare and see what this different bayonet lug is all about..

7983612065_dfc636c5fb_o.jpg
 
What? No picture of the bolt face?

Nice SKS BTW.

I'll do that when I have time. The bolt face is brand new, off the assembly line perfect. :)

Thanks to all. She's my favourite now. Though out of the many SKS's I've owned or own, there's still two others that get photographed and admired alot as well: A mint (and when I say mint, I mean PERFECT) unissued 1951 Tula with a shiney bayonet. I also own a '54 IZH import non-refurb with the pin welded follower that has the most beautiful stock you've ever seen: dark red and black. All three get a spot in my locker, the rest get displayed prominently in my crowded "hobby room". :)
 
I'm looking to pick up an SKS in the next couple days, I read the sticky but am left with some questions.
What is the ideal SKS to be looking for? I.e is Tula better than Izhevsk? are the newer ones better than old? I'll be buying to shoot but would still like to get a nice rifle.
Right now I've been looking on westrifle.com, any other good spots to look? or a link to something on westrifle or otherwise that makes for a good buy? Im trying to learn the ins and outs of buying the SKS but find myself just a tad impatient I guess you could say. As the days get shorter (and subsequently my range time) I'm looking for something sooner rather than later.

They're all equally good. The Izhevsk's just command a few more dollars because fewer of them were made. According to my SKS registry (which has 2350 entries), less than 5% of all SKS's entered were made at the Izhevsk Mechanical Plant, the rest were made at the Tula Arms Factory. Some say that the Izhevsk's were made with more care. That may be partly true, as evidenced by my mint 1953, but I have Tulas of equal beauty: deep bluing, excellent wood-to-metal fitment, clean/sharp cartouches and proofs, and nicely finished stocks. Personal observations are that quality and fitment started to drop after 1954. Sorry, but it's true. The least attractive SKS's I've handled (non-refurbished) seem to be the later ones, especially the 'no-daters'. But of course, there's exceptions to every rule. However, regardless of finishing, they all seem to shoot about the same. That goes for Chinese SKS's which I don't collect, but others seem to like.

One of my best shooters is a lowly refurbished frankenpinned 1952 Tula... pretty darn rough and ugly, but prints 3 inch groups at 100 yards using the irons. Hard to beat that, regardless of semi-auto brand!

Just as FYI, the rarest Russian SKS you will ever find, save the unissued/non-refurbished 1949 (which don't exist), are the 1953 Izhevsk's. Of the 5% noted above, only 10% of that 5% are dated 1953! And a non-refurbished version is even rarer!

My suggestion: buy every 1953 Izhevsk you can find. They will command the highest dollar in the future.
Flamingchicken has an all-matching laminate 1953 for sale right now. Apparently with a low serial number, which makes it even more interesting.

If the funds and space weren't an issue, it would be in my collection as I type.

I forgot to add, 1949 refurbs are more common than 1953 non-refurbs... according to my registry. In fact, 1953 refurbs are about as common as 1949 refurbs.
 
Last edited:
The math regarding the 1953 Izhevsk SKS...

Let's say there are 200 SKS's on the rack.
5% or 10 of them will be Izhevsk made.
Of the 10 Izhevsk's 1 will be a 1953.

Of that 1 1953 Izhevsk SKS, there is a 2/3 (~66%) or greater chance of it being refurbished.

Of the 2350 SKS registry entries, I think there's 3 or 4 non-refurbs. That equates to, at best, .17% !

So, on a rareness basis, buy them ! :)

9678353989_feae56d672_b.jpg
 
Another truck gun.















Kidding it looks good. I didn't know about the lug thing. Probably because I only own one SKS. To many other awesome rifles to own.
 
Was looking at a 1956 hardwood on Westrifle's site. It has a small star on the receiver in one of the pics. I was reading about sks on Wikipedia and remembered something about Vietnamese Sks's that had a star on the receiver. Is that what it is or am I on crack? Are 1956 ones rare?
 
Was looking at a 1956 hardwood on Westrifle's site. It has a small star on the receiver in one of the pics. I was reading about sks on Wikipedia and remembered something about Vietnamese Sks's that had a star on the receiver. Is that what it is or am I on crack? Are 1956 ones rare?

It is a late 55, or 1956 Russian Tula. They stopped dating the recoil spring cover in late 55, and started stamping a star where you saw it. Pretty standard.
 
I just picked one at Cdn T today too. No ###xx on the stock,but black bayonet. Does the black bayo automatically mean refurb?
 
I just picked one at Cdn T today too. No ###xx on the stock,but black bayonet. Does the black bayo automatically mean refurb?

I forgot to mention 53 izzy,I asked the guy to find one with circle & arrow,Thanks Cdn Tire Guy !!
 
Why are some bayonets a gold color? If the op's SKS is so special what is it worth compared to a regular SKS? The big question is what's it worth? I feel like I'm watching storage wars.
 
Why are some bayonets a gold color? If the op's SKS is so special what is it worth compared to a regular SKS? The big question is what's it worth? I feel like I'm watching storage wars.

Not my "big question"... value is whatever somebody is willing to pay.
The gold bayo debate has been beaten to death. Use the search function and you will be rewarded with a wealth of information.
 
Back
Top Bottom